Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Coda ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
38PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.



| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Coda | implicit context Coda may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
| Proof strip under the CTA: "Backed by Y Combinator" and "75,000+ users" | |
| "Trusted by 98% of the Forbes Cloud 100" with Riot Games, affirm, and 1Password logos (mobile) | |
| Live "Ask anything" product interface | |
| implicit context Claude (Anthropic) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
Value props
52FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Coda is now Superhuman Docs!
Much more than a name change, Superhuman Docs evolves Coda into the best place for teams to collaborate with AI, along with enterprise-ready databases, new AI Views, and so much more.
Working
- Names concrete features (AI Views, databases)
- Rebrand messaging is consistent with banner
- Second section names the real category
Could improve
- H1 announces a rebrand, not value
- No numbers, proof, or outcomes
- No hero image showing the product
Information hierarchy
58FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
62FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Coda compares
Recommended rewrites
