Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust
56Growth scoreupdated

category scores

category scoresShowHide

Trust

38Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Notion (Notion AI)
River
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
Trust read
Codaimplicit context Coda may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
RiverProof strip under the CTA: "Backed by Y Combinator" and "75,000+ users"
Notion (Notion AI)"Trusted by 98% of the Forbes Cloud 100" with Riot Games, affirm, and 1Password logos (mobile)
ChatGPT (OpenAI)Live "Ask anything" product interface
Claude (Anthropic)implicit context Claude (Anthropic) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.

Value props

52Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Coda’s headline undersellsCoda is now Superhuman Docs!Much more than a name change, Superhuman Docs evolves Coda into the best place for teams to collaborate with AI, along with enterprise-ready databases, new AI Views, and so much more.

Working

  • Names concrete features (AI Views, databases)
  • Rebrand messaging is consistent with banner
  • Second section names the real category

Could improve

  • H1 announces a rebrand, not value
  • No numbers, proof, or outcomes
  • No hero image showing the product

Information hierarchy

58Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Coda desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

Mobile web

62Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Coda mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Coda

How Coda compares

Recommended rewrites