Clayhttps://clay.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Clay ranks

  1. 1.Artisan76
  2. 2.Cluster75
  3. 3.AiSDR74
  4. 4.11x70
  5. 5.Clay66
  6. 6.Unify66
Fix Trust
66Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust44Mobile web62
category scoresShowHide
Trust44Mobile web62

Trust

44Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Clay
11x
Artisan
AiSDR
Cluster
Trust read
Clay"or install directly with" row showing Anthropic and OpenAI integration icons next to the CTAs
Cluster"BACKED BY a16z / speedrun" investor badge above the headline
11x"$70M+ raised from a16z and Benchmark" banner
Artisan"SOC 2 Type II" and "GDPR" compliance badges with "Integrates with Salesforce and HubSpot" directly beneath the Get star
AiSDR"THIS EMAIL BOOKED MEETINGS WITH" strip showing Google, Microsoft, Zendesk, Pfizer, Uber, Temu with tags like "Meeting i
UnifyLive agent prompt demo: "Write personalized emails to the CEOs of Linear and Sierra"

Mobile web

62Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Cookie consent banner — Dead blocker eating the bottom third of the viewport with no conversion-valuable CTA.
  2. Split CTA pair — Two side-by-side half-width buttons compete; neither gets the full-bleed thumb target mobile deserves.

Value props

68Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Clay’s headlineBuild systems to grow revenueInfrastructure to get any data, run agentic workflows, and launch GTM plays.

Working

Could improve

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Clay desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

CTA

84Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Clay

How Clay compares

Recommended rewrites