Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Blitzy ranks
Trust
44PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.



| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Blitzy | "80% + of entire projects delivered with end-to-end tested code" claim in the hero subheadline |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| Embedded Devin session demo showing the task "Migrate all gradient text to #317CFF in both repos, then test" with real P | |
| implicit context OpenAI Codex may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. | |
| Live code demo showing the agent working: "Applying: implement click..." status over a React snippet | |
| No visible trust signal identified. |
Mobile web
63FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
1234- White paper promo banner — Eats the top ~15% of the fold with a competing 'Download Now' CTA, pushing the hero and primary CTAs to the bottom edge.
- Hero headline — Desktop-scale type wraps into five lines, consuming half the viewport before the value prop finishes.
- Body paragraph — Eight dense lines of desktop copy crammed into the phone column delay the CTAs.
- Side-by-side CTA pair — Two half-width buttons compete at the fold's bottom edge instead of one full-bleed primary action.
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Blitzy compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Value props
78FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Autonomous software development at enterprise scale
Blitzy reverse engineers 100M+ lines of existing code, constructs a deep architectural understanding, then autonomously builds, refactors, and modernizes. The result is 80% + of entire projects delivered with end-to-end tested code. Built f
Working
Could improve
