Aurigohttps://aurigo.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Aurigo ranks

  1. 1.Rilla72
  2. 2.ServiceTitan70
  3. 3.BuildOps68
  4. 4.Sitetracker65
  5. 5.Capveon64
  6. 6.Aurigo60
Fix Trust
60Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust30Value props58
category scoresShowHide
Trust30Value props58

Trust

30Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

ServiceTitan
Sitetracker
Rilla
BuildOps
Capveon
Trust read
AurigoNo visible trust signal identified.
Capveon"Backed by Y Combinator" badge in the header
RillaCustomer logo strip (Kohler, Neighborly, Groundworks) under "Trusted by leading sales teams in home improvement, home bu
ServiceTitanCapterra 4.5-star and Software Advice 4.5-star review badges below the Get Started CTA
BuildOpsCustomer logo strip (Holmes, Haynes, NexCore, Remco) with a partial "TRUSTED BY... COMMERCIAL CONTRACTORS" count at the
Sitetracker"Industry leaders use Sitetracker" logo wall (Ericsson, BT, EVgo, Vantage Towers, Telefónica)

Value props

58Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Aurigo’s headline vagueBuild a better tomorrowPlan, build, and maintain capital programs with an AI-native platform built for Life sciences owners

Working

  • Subhead names workflow: plan, build, maintain
  • Audience rotation targets specific owners
  • AI-native platform positioning is clear

Could improve

  • H1 could caption any company
  • Broken video embed kills the demo
  • No numbers or proof points in fold

Information hierarchy

68Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Aurigo desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Aurigo

How Aurigo compares

Recommended rewrites

Mobile web

74Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Aurigo mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve