apate.aihttps://apate.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How apate.ai ranks

  1. 1.BeeSafe AI72
  2. 2.Netcraft64
  3. 3.Scamnetic61
  4. 4.apate.ai59
Fix Trust
59Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust32Mobile web58
category scoresShowHide
Trust32Mobile web58

Trust

32Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

BeeSafe AI
Netcraft
Scamnetic
Trust read
apate.aiNo visible trust signal identified.
BeeSafe AI"Backed by" logo strip: Y Combinator, Obvious, NSF America's Seed Fund
NetcraftNora chat widget claim: "taking down phishing sites quickly, often within 33 minutes"
ScamneticFootnoted market statistics: "$579B Global losses to fraud scams and bank fraud schemes" and "73% Americans have experie

Mobile web

58Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Overlapping headline text — The rotating headline animation collides — "game." ghosts through "by gathering critical intelligence." making the value statement unreadable.
  2. Truncated headline line — "intelligence." is clipped at the descenders, signaling a broken text container on the phone viewport.
  3. Side-by-side CTA pair — "Book a Demo" and "See Our Bots in Action" compete on one row; neither gets full-bleed thumb width.

Value props

64Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

apate.ai’s headlineWe turn the tables on scammers, by beating them at their own game.We revolutionise scam prevention, disruption and intelligence by deploying advanced conversational AI bots at scale.

Working

Could improve

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

apate.ai

How apate.ai compares

Recommended rewrites

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

apate.ai desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve