CodeWispYC W26 landing page report.
← Back to YC W26
CodeWisphttps://codewisp.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.

How CodeWisp ranks

  1. 1.Rosebud AI72
  2. 2.CrazyGames67
  3. 3.Poki (with playful web games hub)64
  4. 4.CodeWisp58
  5. 5.Websim57
Fix Value props
58Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Value props38Information hierarchy58Mobile web58Trust66CTA72
category scoresShowHide
Value props38Information hierarchy58Mobile web58Trust66CTA72

Score over time

8070605040Rosebud AI 64 on Jun 7 (Wayback)Rosebud AI 72 on Jul 30 (Live)Poki (with playful web games hub) 60 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Poki (with playful web games hub) 59 on Jul 1 (Wayback)Poki (with playful web games hub) 59 on Jul 13 (Wayback)Poki (with playful web games hub) 61 on Aug 10 (Wayback)Poki (with playful web games hub) 63 on Aug 22 (Wayback)Poki (with playful web games hub) 59 on Sep 7 (Wayback)Poki (with playful web games hub) 64 on Sep 21 (Live)CrazyGames 54 on Apr 20 (Wayback)CrazyGames 62 on Sep 6 (Wayback)CrazyGames 67 on Sep 21 (Live)Websim 54 on May 7 (Wayback)Websim 54 on May 21 (Wayback)Websim 57 on Jun 4 (Wayback)Websim 52 on Jun 19 (Wayback)Websim 53 on Jul 3 (Wayback)Websim 53 on Jul 17 (Wayback)Websim 57 on Jul 30 (Live)CodeWisp 58 on Sep 22 (Live)Sep 22

Value props

38Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

CodeWisp’s headline vagueRecommended

Working

  • Game art shows real content instantly
  • Play counts and likes act as social proof
  • Featured carousel proves an active catalog

Could improve

  • No headline explains what CodeWisp is
  • Platform value hidden behind a game promo
  • Zero copy about creating or AI features

Information hierarchy

58Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. PLAY button — Primary CTA is a thin outlined bar at the panel's bottom, visually outranked by the hero art and leaderboard above it.
  2. Nav link row — Five equal-weight links plus search open exits before the visitor reaches the PLAY action.
  3. Game description text — Truncated mid-sentence with raw **markdown** asterisks, so the value message never lands.
  4. Leaderboard panel — Usernames and scores sit directly above the CTA at equal weight, competing with the action instead of supporting it.

Mobile web

58Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Raw markdown description — Shows unrendered **Aether Rush** and broken glyph boxes, plus seven long monospace lines that push the CTA down.
  2. Duplicate hero banner — The same Aether Rush art appears twice back-to-back (banner then thumbnail), wasting scroll depth before any action.

Trust

66Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

CrazyGames
Trust read
CodeWispNo visible trust signal identified.
Rosebud AILive product prompt UI with 'gemini-flash' model selector and '0/1000' character counter
Poki (with playful web games hub)implicit context Poki (with playful web games hub) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
CrazyGamesLive Bloxd.io gameplay preview with real player chat and nameplates in the "Top games in 🇺🇸 today" rail
Websim'899k' plays and '3.1k' likes counter on the Modern Wars (DEMO) card

CTA

72Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

CodeWisp
Rosebud AIin-product action

Problems

  • outline style, weak footprint
  • below the fold on mobile
  • Sign in outshines it in header
  • no payoff context around button

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Rosebud AIrosebud.ai72 #2CrazyGamescrazygames.com67 #3Poki (with playful web games hub)poki.com64
#4CodeWisp58
#5Websimwebsim.com57—itch.ioitch.iofailed