Leaping AIYC W25 landing page report.
← Back to YC W25

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

Fix CTA

Score over time

908070605040Retell AI 69 on Apr 3 (Wayback)Retell AI 71 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Retell AI 69 on Jul 23 (Wayback)Retell AI 67 on Aug 22 (Wayback)Retell AI 74 on Sep 20 (Live)Bland AI 69 on May 7 (Wayback)Bland AI 76 on May 19 (Wayback)Bland AI 75 on May 30 (Wayback)Bland AI 74 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Bland AI 75 on Jul 23 (Wayback)Bland AI 74 on Aug 23 (Wayback)Bland AI 76 on Sep 20 (Live)Synthflow 51 on Apr 4 (Wayback)Synthflow 50 on Apr 13 (Wayback)Synthflow 51 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Synthflow 56 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Synthflow 58 on Jul 30 (Wayback)Synthflow 54 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Synthflow 71 on Sep 22 (Live)Goodcall 72 on May 18 (Wayback)Goodcall 70 on Jun 11 (Wayback)Goodcall 72 on Jun 23 (Wayback)Goodcall 72 on Jul 11 (Wayback)Goodcall 71 on Aug 21 (Live)Goodcall 69 on Sep 16 (Wayback)Goodcall 70 on Oct 5 (Wayback)Avoca 71 on May 3 (Wayback)Avoca 72 on May 18 (Wayback)Avoca 70 on Jun 30 (Wayback)Avoca 78 on Jul 28 (Live)Avoca 70 on Sep 6 (Wayback)Avoca 70 on Sep 13 (Wayback)Avoca 75 on Oct 15 (Wayback)Leaping AI 70 on Sep 22 (Live)Sep 22

CTA

62Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Leaping AI
Retell AI
Goodcall
Avoca
Synthflow
Bland AI

Problems

  • demo booking feels costly
  • no way to try the voice agent
  • small vs. huge headline
  • no secondary low-friction path

Value props

64Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Leaping AI’s headline undersellsAI voice and text agentsNever miss another lead. Answer every call, respond in seconds, and book more appointments.

Working

  • Subhead names real outcomes: leads, calls, bookings
  • "Never miss another lead" hits a real fear
  • ICP-relevant trust logos (windows, bath, exteriors)

Could improve

  • H1 is a category label, not a value claim
  • No numbers anywhere in the fold
  • Hero phone mockup shows a face, not the agent working

Trust

66Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Leaping AI
Retell AI
Bland AI
Avoca
Trust read
Leaping AI"Trusted by" logo strip with six named customers (Feldco, Florida Window & Door, Panda Exteriors, Maverick Windows, Bath
Retell AIG2 4.8-star rating badge above the subheadline
Bland AI"672,759,648 calls resolved to date" counter beneath the Book a call CTA
SynthflowAnalyst quadrant chart "Pioneering Solution for Voicebot/Conversational IVR" positioning Synthflow above named competito
Goodcall"Born at Google." heading with supporting copy on the mobile capture
Avoca"Trusted by 1,000+ Service Leaders" badge

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Five-link navigation bar — Products, Customers, Blog, Industries, and Pricing all offer exits at equal weight before the demo CTA.
  2. Phone mockup cut off — The brand's strongest visual — the AI agent's face — sits mostly below the fold, contributing nothing at first glance.
  3. Faded trust logo row — Grayscale, low-contrast logos are barely legible, weakening the social proof they exist to deliver.
  4. Duplicate Book a demo — The nav's dark pill duplicates the hero CTA at equal visual weight, splitting the click target.

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Hero Book a demo — Desktop-proportioned button floating in the column instead of a full-width thumb target.
  2. Four-line subheadline — Long copy wraps into four lines, pushing trust proof and the phone visual down the fold.
  3. Duplicate header CTA — Second "Book a demo" in the sticky header competes with the identical hero button.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop