Verdict MachineYC S26 landing page report.
← Back to YC S26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Verdict Machine ranks

  1. 1.Cyvers77
  2. 2.Blockaid73
  3. 3.Hypernative66
  4. 4.Verdict Machine65
  5. 5.Chainalysis (Hexagate)54
Fix Trust

Score over time

80706050Chainalysis (Hexagate) 54 on Sep 20 (Live)Hypernative 57 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Hypernative 59 on May 3 (Wayback)Hypernative 59 on May 20 (Wayback)Hypernative 76 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Hypernative 69 on Aug 2 (Wayback)Hypernative 66 on Sep 9 (Wayback)Hypernative 66 on Sep 20 (Live)Cyvers 70 on May 7 (Wayback)Cyvers 72 on May 17 (Wayback)Cyvers 71 on Jun 10 (Wayback)Cyvers 70 on Jul 11 (Wayback)Cyvers 77 on Sep 20 (Live)Blockaid 72 on May 1 (Wayback)Blockaid 71 on May 15 (Wayback)Blockaid 71 on Jun 4 (Wayback)Blockaid 68 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Blockaid 72 on Aug 17 (Wayback)Blockaid 70 on Aug 27 (Wayback)Blockaid 73 on Sep 20 (Live)Verdict Machine 66 on Aug 21 (Wayback)Verdict Machine 65 on Sep 20 (Live)Aug 21Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202665LiveOverall −1 · CTA +4 · Trust −4Viewing
  2. Aug 21, 202666First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 82, weakest Trust 48View →

Trust

44Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Verdict Machine
Cyvers
Blockaid
Chainalysis (Hexagate)
Trust read
Verdict Machine"Backed by Y Combinator" badge in the header
Chainalysis (Hexagate)"Powered by Chainalysis blockchain intelligence and advanced ML models" subhead tying Hexagate to the Chainalysis platfo
Hypernative"Agent Feed" threat panel showing detections like "OFAC-Sanctioned", "Cross-Chain Bridge Anomaly", and "Stablecoin Depeg
CyversLogo strip "TRUSTED BY THE WORLD'S LEADING CRYPTO INSTITUTIONS" with Uphold, Nexo, BitGo, 21shares, ZebPay, Keyrock, TRM
Blockaid"PROTECTING THE BEST" logo strip with Coinbase, MetaMask, Stellar, Polymarket, World, and Rainbow

CTA

62Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Verdict Machine
Cyvers
Hypernative
Blockaid
Chainalysis (Hexagate)

Problems

  • label hides the contact-form intent
  • 'Learn more' promises no payoff
  • competes with nav's 'Book a call'
  • no action-specific verb

Value props

64Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Verdict Machine’s headline sellsAI cybersecurity for financial institutions' digital assets.AI that understands each institution's complete on-chain environment, assesses its cyber risk, and generates tailored controls to prevent hacks.

Working

  • Names exact buyer: financial institutions
  • Subhead explains real mechanism
  • "Prevent hacks" states the outcome

Could improve

  • Zero numbers or proof points
  • No emotional stakes of a breach
  • No hero visual showing product

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Learn more button — Primary form CTA labeled 'Learn more' — vague low-commitment label on the highest-intent element, and it competes with 'Book a call' in the header.
  2. Book a call button — Second green CTA in the header splits the visitor's action between two paths of equal styling weight.
  3. Y Combinator badge — Orange badge is the highest-saturation element on the fold, outranking both CTAs in the visual scan path.

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Three-field fold form — Name, company, and email stacked before the button turns one tap into a three-field commitment on a phone.
  2. 'Learn more' button label — Vague label undersells a form submit and competes with the header's 'Book a call' for the primary action.
  3. Orange 'Y' badge — Stripped of its 'Backed by Y Combinator' text on mobile, it reads as an unexplained orange square next to the CTA.