Most RoboticYC S26 landing page report.
← Back to YC S26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.

Fix Value props

Score over time

807060504030Physical Intelligence 56 on Jul 24 (Live)Skild AI 50 on Jul 24 (Live)Generalist AI 66 on Jun 12 (Wayback)Generalist AI 66 on Jun 30 (Wayback)Generalist AI 66 on Jul 16 (Wayback)Generalist AI 69 on Aug 6 (Wayback)Generalist AI 68 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Generalist AI 70 on Sep 8 (Wayback)Generalist AI 67 on Sep 20 (Live)1X Technologies 68 on Apr 1 (Wayback)1X Technologies 39 on Apr 17 (Wayback)1X Technologies 65 on Apr 30 (Wayback)1X Technologies 67 on May 16 (Wayback)1X Technologies 67 on May 26 (Wayback)1X Technologies 68 on Jun 25 (Wayback)1X Technologies 67 on Jul 24 (Live)Dexterity 66 on Mar 27 (Wayback)Dexterity 65 on Apr 10 (Wayback)Dexterity 66 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Dexterity 66 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Dexterity 67 on Aug 22 (Wayback)Dexterity 66 on Sep 14 (Wayback)Dexterity 67 on Sep 20 (Live)Most Robotic 64 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 20

Value props

48Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Most Robotic’s headline vagueA robotics research lab pushing what's possible with physical AI

Working

  • YC badge lends credibility
  • Names the category clearly
  • Clean, confident tone

Could improve

  • No subhead adds specifics
  • "Pushing what's possible" is empty
  • Hero art decorates, doesn't demo

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Most Robotic
Generalist AI
Physical Intelligence
Trust read
Most Robotic"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline
Physical IntelligenceDated research timeline, e.g. "π0.7: a Steerable Model with Emergent Capabilities — April 16, 2026"
Skild AINo visible trust signal identified.
Generalist AI"All videos 1x speed, fully autonomous" caption over real robot demo footage
1X TechnologiesHero photography of the NEO robot in three colorways
DexterityNo visible trust signal identified.

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Most Robotic
1X Technologies
Dexterity

Problems

  • contact ask feels costly
  • no payoff named for the click
  • generic label, no product tie-in

Mobile web

72Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Stacked nav row — Nav doesn't collapse — 'about' and 'get in touch →' wrap into a second header row instead of a hamburger.
  2. Half-width primary CTA — 'get in touch' stays desktop-proportioned instead of going full-bleed for the thumb.
  3. Duplicate CTA pair — 'about us ↓' matches the primary button's size and weight, splitting attention from the coral CTA.

Information hierarchy

84Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. about us button — Same size and shape as the primary CTA, splitting attention at the decision point.
  2. nav get in touch — Duplicates the hero CTA in a different outlined style, diluting the single action's weight.
  3. coral get in touch — Small footprint relative to the oversized headline; the eye lands on it last, not first.