EnactYC S26 landing page report.
← Back to YC S26

Score over time

8070605040Scale AI (Physical AI / Robotics Data) 62 on May 30 (Wayback)Scale AI (Physical AI / Robotics Data) 62 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Scale AI (Physical AI / Robotics Data) 49 on Jul 11 (Wayback)Scale AI (Physical AI / Robotics Data) 64 on Aug 23 (Wayback)Scale AI (Physical AI / Robotics Data) 62 on Sep 5 (Wayback)Scale AI (Physical AI / Robotics Data) 61 on Sep 20 (Live)Dexterity Data (Micro1) / Encord 71 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Dexterity Data (Micro1) / Encord 72 on Jun 23 (Wayback)Dexterity Data (Micro1) / Encord 71 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Dexterity Data (Micro1) / Encord 71 on Jul 18 (Wayback)Dexterity Data (Micro1) / Encord 70 on Jul 30 (Wayback)Dexterity Data (Micro1) / Encord 73 on Aug 23 (Wayback)Dexterity Data (Micro1) / Encord 74 on Sep 20 (Live)Physical Intelligence 56 on Jul 24 (Live)Enact 66 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 20

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Enact
Dexterity Data (Micro1) / Encord
Physical Intelligence
Trust read
Enact"backed by Y Combinator" and "started at Stanford" footer badges
Scale AI (Physical AI / Robotics Data)implicit context Scale AI (Physical AI / Robotics Data) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
Dexterity Data (Micro1) / EncordCustomer logo strip below the hero: Path Robotics, Woven by Toyota, Zipline, Pickle Robot, Toyota Research Institute, We
Physical IntelligenceDated research timeline, e.g. "π0.7: a Steerable Model with Emergent Capabilities — April 16, 2026"

Value props

62Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Enact’s headline undersellsThe post-training layer for physical AI.Enact generates the data that makes robotics models useful in the real world. We roll out policies on tasks, identify the states where they fail, and generate targeted demonstration and recovery datasets. We evaluate model performance in-ho

Working

  • Subhead names a concrete mechanism
  • Fail-state targeting is a real differentiator
  • Stanford + YC proof anchors credibility

Could improve

  • Headline is positioning, not outcome
  • Zero numbers anywhere in the fold
  • No hero visual showing the product work

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Enact
Dexterity Data (Micro1) / Encord

Problems

  • 'Request' feels like asking, not getting
  • click implies form + sales wait
  • small footprint vs headline on desktop

Mobile web

76Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Request data button — Desktop-proportioned width leaves a small thumb target instead of a near-full-bleed mobile CTA.
  2. Seven-line body paragraph — Desktop-length paragraph wraps into seven lines, forcing a dense read before the CTA.
  3. Launch banner chip — "We launched Enact on X" sits above the headline and pulls first attention off the value statement.

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. X launch announcement pill — First interactive element on the page is an outbound link to X, sitting above the headline and CTA.
  2. Footer social links — X and LinkedIn exits creep into the fold and compete with Request data.
  3. Three-line body paragraph — 47 words at uniform weight is a scan burden; on mobile it balloons to seven lines before the CTA.