Amorphic LabsYC S26 landing page report.
← Back to YC S26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Mobile web.

Fix Mobile web

Score over time

100806040200PayAI (x402 ecosystem marketplaces) 37 on May 14 (Wayback)PayAI (x402 ecosystem marketplaces) 68 on May 29 (Wayback)PayAI (x402 ecosystem marketplaces) 25 on Jun 9 (Wayback)PayAI (x402 ecosystem marketplaces) 68 on Sep 3 (Wayback)PayAI (x402 ecosystem marketplaces) 68 on Sep 20 (Live)Fewsats 64 on May 15 (Wayback)Fewsats 62 on Jun 6 (Wayback)Fewsats 62 on Sep 20 (Live)Nevermined 75 on Sep 20 (Live)Smithery 63 on Apr 1 (Wayback)Smithery 68 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Smithery 68 on Jun 8 (Wayback)Smithery 67 on Jul 7 (Wayback)Smithery 67 on Aug 10 (Wayback)Smithery 67 on Sep 5 (Wayback)Smithery 65 on Sep 20 (Live)Amorphic Labs 61 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 20

Mobile web

54Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Uncollapsed nav row — Full desktop link row crammed in; 'Setup' clips at the right edge instead of collapsing to a hamburger.
  2. Three stacked CTA cards — Three competing pastel cards with no button styling; no single primary action stands out or fills the width.
  3. Sign up card width — Desktop-proportioned card floats partial-width in the phone column instead of a thumb-friendly full-bleed button.

Information hierarchy

58Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Three pastel CTA cards — Three same-weight cards split the primary action; no visitor knows which one the page wants clicked.
  2. Featured provider grid — Seven cards with identical weight and arrows create a directory feel and fourteen exit paths above the fold.
  3. Provider table in fold — A dense filterable data table crowds the first viewport, competing with the headline and CTAs for attention.
  4. Top navigation row — Four nav links plus theme toggle leak attention before any conversion surface is established.

CTA

58Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Amorphic Labs
PayAI (x402 ecosystem marketplaces)
Smitheryin-product action
Fewsats
Nevermined

Problems

  • three equal tiles, no dominant CTA
  • tile styling, doesn't read as button
  • $10 credit not framed as free
  • generic 'Sign up', no value promise

Value props

64Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Amorphic Labs’s headline undersellsCapability market2004 publishers across 8494 listings — trust standing and fixed call prices and variable pricing.

Working

  • Hard numbers: 2004 publishers, 8494 listings
  • Trust and pricing named up front
  • Featured cards show real, concrete supply

Could improve

  • Headline names category, not benefit
  • No outcome for the buyer stated
  • "fixed call prices and variable pricing" is muddled

Trust

72Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Amorphic Labs
Nevermined
Trust read
Amorphic Labs"2004 publishers across 8494 listings" backed by the live provider table with Verified badges and fixed call prices
PayAI (x402 ecosystem marketplaces)Ecosystem builder logo row next to "Explore the x402 ecosystem and its builders"
Fewsats"How it works" panel with AI Agent → Service Provider flow and terminal snippet ("Error: Payment required to proceed.")
NeverminedISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and PCI SAQ-D compliance badges in the logo bar
SmitheryMCP server cards with usage counts, e.g. "Exa Search — 9.18k uses" and "OneSignal — 22.49k uses"