ContextFortYC S25 landing page report.
← Back to YC S25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

908070605040Corridor 77 on Sep 22 (Live)Invariant Labs 62 on May 22 (Wayback)Invariant Labs 61 on Jun 8 (Wayback)Invariant Labs 62 on Jun 26 (Wayback)Invariant Labs 60 on Jul 23 (Wayback)Invariant Labs 62 on Aug 4 (Wayback)Invariant Labs 60 on Sep 3 (Wayback)Invariant Labs 63 on Sep 20 (Live)Zenity 58 on Apr 13 (Wayback)Zenity 68 on Sep 20 (Live)Cased (agent security) — Prompt Security 73 on Mar 24 (Wayback)Cased (agent security) — Prompt Security 74 on Apr 24 (Wayback)Cased (agent security) — Prompt Security 74 on May 25 (Wayback)Cased (agent security) — Prompt Security 75 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Cased (agent security) — Prompt Security 74 on Jul 16 (Wayback)Cased (agent security) — Prompt Security 51 on Sep 20 (Live)Knostic 64 on Apr 18 (Wayback)Knostic 62 on May 11 (Wayback)Knostic 62 on May 27 (Wayback)Knostic 62 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Knostic 62 on Jul 14 (Wayback)Knostic 63 on Aug 19 (Wayback)Knostic 62 on Sep 20 (Live)ContextFort 69 on Sep 22 (Live)Sep 22

Trust

58Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

ContextFort
Corridor
Zenity
Trust read
ContextFort"Backed by Y Combinator" badge
CorridorCustomer logo wall (Etsy, ElevenLabs, Lovable, LangChain, Qlik) under "Trusted by leading security teams"
Invariant Labs"Snyk Acquires Invariant Labs to Accelerate Agentic AI Security Innovation" banner with "A snyk Company" logo mark
ZenityGartner® named Zenity the Company to Beat in AI Agent Governance
Cased (agent security) — Prompt SecuritySentinelOne | Prompt Security co-branded header lockup
KnosticSubhead specificity: "We detect shadow AI, block data exfiltration, and stop destructive commands like rm -rf."

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Clipped green headline — "for AI Agents in t" overflows the viewport and cuts off the key phrase "the Endpoint".
  2. Book a demo CTA — Primary CTA sits below the first mobile viewport, pushed down by the headline and feature stack.
  3. Feature label row — Three tiny gray labels wrap into cramped two-line columns that read poorly at phone size.

CTA

72Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

ContextFort

Problems

  • demo click feels costly, sales-gated
  • no self-serve path despite GitHub repo
  • payoff of the demo not stated

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

ContextFort’s headline sellsVisibility and Controls for AI Agents in the EndpointKnow exactly what coding agents are doing on your engineers' machines.

Working

  • Subhead names audience and fear precisely
  • Cursor/Claude Code badges anchor the claim
  • Proof chips list concrete monitored signals

Could improve

  • No numbers or quantified outcomes anywhere
  • No product screenshot proving "visibility"
  • Mobile headline clips: "for AI Agents in t"

Information hierarchy

76Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Green italic headline line — Second headline line "for AI Agents in the Endpoint" overflows and clips on mobile, cutting the value prop mid-word.
  2. Duplicate Book a demo — Nav "Book a demo" duplicates the hero CTA at equal green weight, splitting the click between two identical targets.
  3. Cursor / Claude badges — Two dark badge chips sit between the subhead and the CTA row with no caption explaining what they are, interrupting the scan path to the action.
  4. View GitHub button — Secondary GitHub button matches the primary CTA's size and sits beside it, pulling technical visitors off-site before booking.