Avelis HealthYC S25 landing page report.
← Back to YC S25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Avelis Health ranks

  1. 1.Avelis Health70
  2. 2.ClarisHealth70
  3. 3.Lyric70
  4. 4.Machinify63
  5. 5.Codoxo58
  6. 6.Anomaly51
Fix Trust

Score over time

807060504030Anomaly 51 on Sep 22 (Live)Machinify 56 on May 9 (Wayback)Machinify 54 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Machinify 54 on Jun 18 (Wayback)Machinify 63 on Sep 22 (Live)ClarisHealth 40 on Apr 22 (Wayback)ClarisHealth 44 on May 15 (Wayback)ClarisHealth 41 on Jun 4 (Wayback)ClarisHealth 67 on Aug 12 (Wayback)ClarisHealth 70 on Sep 22 (Live)Codoxo 60 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Codoxo 61 on May 17 (Wayback)Codoxo 59 on Jun 10 (Wayback)Codoxo 60 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Codoxo 59 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Codoxo 58 on Sep 8 (Wayback)Codoxo 58 on Sep 22 (Live)Lyric 49 on Mar 25 (Wayback)Lyric 57 on Apr 3 (Wayback)Lyric 51 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Lyric 49 on Aug 5 (Wayback)Lyric 70 on Sep 22 (Live)Avelis Health 54 on Jul 19 (Wayback)Avelis Health 70 on Sep 22 (Live)Jul 19Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202670LiveOverall +16 · Mobile web +46 · Trust +18Viewing
  2. Jul 19, 202654First tracked report — strongest Value props 74, weakest Mobile web 22View →

Trust

56Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Avelis Health
ClarisHealth
Lyric
Trust read
Avelis Health"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline
AnomalyNo visible trust signal identified.
MachinifyNo visible trust signal identified.
ClarisHealth"$17.8B in claims savings processed in Pareo last year" stat chip
CodoxoNo visible trust signal identified.
Lyric"Nine of the top 10 U.S. health plans verify claims with Lyric before payment moves."

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Avelis Health
Machinify
Codoxo

Problems

  • demo booking feels costly
  • no value in the click
  • secondary CTA is a noun label

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Primary CTA below fold — The 'Book a demo' button sits roughly 1,000px down the mobile page, past the first viewport for most iPhone-class screens.
  2. Serif headline height — 'Audit Avelis Health's medical claims with AI' wraps to three oversized lines (~300px tall), pushing the subhead and CTAs down the page.
  3. AI Call Center button — Secondary CTA is styled at nearly the same size and weight as 'Book a demo', splitting the tap decision immediately below it.

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Avelis Health’s headline sellsAudit your medical claims with AIPayment integrity for TPAs and health plans. Save 2-7% on plan spend annually.

Working

  • Names the exact job and mechanism
  • 2-7% savings number is concrete
  • Subhead targets TPAs and health plans

Could improve

  • Hero is empty — no product shown
  • No emotional hook on wasted spend
  • No recovered-dollars proof point

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. AI Call Center button — Same size and placement as Book a demo, splitting attention from the one primary action.
  2. Header Book a demo — Duplicates the hero CTA, giving two equal-weight targets for the same action.
  3. Y Combinator badge — Bright orange link outranks the headline in the scan path and leaks clicks off-site.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop