Memory StoreYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Memory Store ranks

  1. 1.Mem078
  2. 2.Zep78
  3. 3.Supermemory75
  4. 4.Memory Store70
  5. 5.Letta52
Fix Trust

Score over time

100806040200Supermemory 72 on May 4 (Wayback)Supermemory 70 on May 19 (Wayback)Supermemory 75 on Jun 1 (Wayback)Supermemory 74 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Supermemory 75 on Jun 27 (Wayback)Supermemory 73 on Jul 18 (Wayback)Supermemory 75 on Jul 28 (Live)Mem0 75 on Mar 7 (Wayback)Mem0 66 on Mar 20 (Wayback)Mem0 70 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Mem0 73 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Mem0 72 on May 15 (Wayback)Mem0 70 on Jun 10 (Wayback)Mem0 78 on Jul 28 (Live)Zep 71 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Zep 70 on May 4 (Wayback)Zep 70 on May 13 (Wayback)Zep 47 on Jun 11 (Wayback)Zep 79 on Jun 30 (Wayback)Zep 78 on Jul 14 (Wayback)Zep 78 on Jul 28 (Live)Letta 63 on Mar 7 (Wayback)Letta 59 on Jun 10 (Wayback)Letta 48 on Jun 26 (Wayback)Letta 50 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Letta 52 on Jul 28 (Live)Letta 51 on Aug 8 (Wayback)Memory Store 27 on Apr 20 (Wayback)Memory Store 72 on May 19 (Wayback)Memory Store 72 on Jun 7 (Wayback)Memory Store 72 on Jul 28 (Wayback)Memory Store 71 on Sep 17 (Wayback)Memory Store 70 on Sep 20 (Live)Apr 20May 19Jun 7Jul 28Sep 17Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202670LiveOverall −1 · Trust −6 · CTA +4Viewing
  2. Sep 17, 202671Overall −1 · Information hierarchy −6 · Value props −2View →
  3. Jul 28, 202672CTA −4 · Trust +4View →
  4. Jun 7, 202672Value props −4 · Information hierarchy −2View →
  5. May 19, 202672Overall +45 · Information hierarchy +60 · Value props +54View →
  6. Apr 20, 202627First tracked report — strongest Trust 32, weakest Information hierarchy 22View →

Trust

52Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Memory Store
Zep
Mem0
Supermemory
Trust read
Memory Store"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the hero headline
Supermemory"Used by the best teams" logo strip (Caret, Jinso, Moonage, Endearing, ChatNow)
Mem0GitHub star badge showing "61,868" stars in the nav
Zep"TRUSTED BY AI TEAMS" logo wall with Samsung, Zscaler, HoneYBOOK, Quorum, and AGI, Inc.
LettaResearch listing "Memory Models: Towards Agents That Learn — JUN 2026"

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Memory Store
Supermemory
Zep
Mem0

Problems

  • demo ask feels costly
  • no self-serve value path
  • secondary 'Dashboard' is a label

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Memory Store’s headline sellsOne shared memory for your teammates, and agentsTurn insights from Gmail, Slack, Granola, Claude, and Codex into memories for your team and agents.

Working

  • Names real tools: Gmail, Slack, Claude
  • Teammates AND agents = clear differentiator
  • YC badge adds instant credibility

Could improve

  • No outcome or emotional payoff named
  • Hero art decorates, never demonstrates
  • "Insights into memories" is circular

Information hierarchy

76Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Dashboard secondary button — Sits beside "Book Demo" at near-equal size and sends prospects into the product instead of the demo funnel.
  2. Duplicate Book Demo nav — A second "Book Demo" in the header competes at similar weight with the hero CTA and splits the scan path.
  3. Inline subheadline icons — Five logo icons embedded mid-sentence chop the value prop into fragments and slow reading.

Mobile web

82Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Split CTA row — Book Demo shares the row at equal weight with Dashboard instead of a full-bleed primary button.
  2. Dashboard secondary button — Ghost button styled like a co-primary steals taps from the demo funnel.
  3. Inline logo subhead — Five inline product icons chop the value sentence into a choppy, harder-to-scan line.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop