flowscopeYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26
flowscopehttps://flowscope.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How flowscope ranks

  1. 1.Lindy79
  2. 2.Artisan76
  3. 3.Gumloop72
  4. 4.Relevance AI70
  5. 5.Nexus (11x)70
  6. 6.flowscope61
Fix Trust
61Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust42CTA54Mobile web62Value props70Information hierarchy78
category scoresShowHide
Trust42CTA54Mobile web62Value props70Information hierarchy78

Score over time

9080706050Gumloop 75 on May 3 (Wayback)Gumloop 73 on May 16 (Wayback)Gumloop 67 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Gumloop 73 on Jul 16 (Wayback)Gumloop 72 on Aug 11 (Wayback)Gumloop 72 on Sep 20 (Live)Lindy 79 on Jul 17 (Live)Lindy 82 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Lindy 78 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Lindy 81 on Sep 17 (Wayback)Relevance AI 64 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Relevance AI 66 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Relevance AI 69 on May 7 (Wayback)Relevance AI 72 on May 19 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Relevance AI 71 on Jun 18 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jul 28 (Live)Artisan 74 on May 1 (Wayback)Artisan 76 on Sep 20 (Live)Nexus (11x) 66 on May 4 (Wayback)Nexus (11x) 69 on May 29 (Wayback)Nexus (11x) 60 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Nexus (11x) 65 on Jul 24 (Wayback)Nexus (11x) 66 on Aug 11 (Wayback)Nexus (11x) 67 on Aug 22 (Wayback)Nexus (11x) 70 on Sep 20 (Live)flowscope 58 on May 11 (Wayback)flowscope 62 on Jun 4 (Wayback)flowscope 60 on Jun 12 (Wayback)flowscope 61 on Sep 20 (Live)May 11Jun 4Jun 12Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202661LiveOverall +1 · Mobile web +14 · Information hierarchy +6Viewing
  2. Jun 12, 202660Overall −2 · Trust −4 · Mobile web −4View →
  3. Jun 4, 202662Overall +4 · Mobile web +10 · CTA +6View →
  4. May 11, 202658First tracked report — strongest Value props 76, weakest Mobile web 42View →

Trust

42Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

flowscope
Gumloop
Artisan
Nexus (11x)
Lindy
Trust read
flowscope"Backed by Y Combinator" badge in the header
Gumloop"We raised a $50M Series B led by Benchmark" banner
LindyG2 badge with 4.9 star rating below the "Try for free" CTA
Relevance AINo visible trust signal identified.
Artisan"SOC 2 Type II" and "GDPR" compliance badges with "Integrates with Salesforce and HubSpot" directly beneath the Get star
Nexus (11x)"$70M+ raised from a16z and Benchmark" banner

CTA

54Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

flowscope
Lindy
Artisan
Gumloop
Nexus (11x)
Relevance AI

Problems

  • styled as text link, low prominence
  • click feels like a sales call
  • four words, over the limit
  • no visual button treatment

Mobile web

62Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture1
  1. Text-link primary CTA — "REQUEST AN INTRODUCTION" is an underlined text link with no button fill or tap-target height, and it sits at the very bottom of the first viewport.

Value props

70Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

flowscope’s headline sellsOur agents learn your business. Then automate it.Our AI agents learn how your business runs. Then automate the repetitive parts. In days, not months.

Working

  • Names the mechanism and outcome plainly
  • "Two weeks shadowing" is concrete process proof
  • "We don't disappear after launch" kills a real fear

Could improve

  • Subhead restates the headline verbatim
  • No named tasks, hours saved, or customers
  • No hero visual showing an agent at work

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Request introduction CTA — Styled as a thin underlined text link at body-copy weight — the page's only action is its least visually prominent element.
  2. Y Combinator badge — The boxed badge is the highest-contrast element in the header, outranking the CTA and offering the fold's one exit path.
  3. Three step cards — All three cards carry identical visual weight, so the eye has no cue which step to read first before finding the action.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Lindylindy.ai79 #2Artisanartisan.co76 #3Gumloopgumloop.com72 #4Relevance AIrelevanceai.com70 #5Nexus (11x)11x.ai70
#6flowscope61