Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
- Sep 20, 202668LiveOverall +1 · Information hierarchy +6 · Trust +4Viewing
- Apr 21, 202667First tracked report — strongest Value props 76, weakest Trust 44View →
Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Astraea ranks
68Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Score over time
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Astraea | "Backed by Y Combinator" badge beneath the Request a Demo CTA |
| Dimmed top banner referencing a 2025 AI Innovation Awards win for clinical trial design (obscured behind the webinar mod | |
| "Saama Wins “AI-based Life Sciences Solution of the Year” Award in 2026 AI Breakthrough Awards" banner | |
| Webinar card citing "expert discussion with Worldwide Clinical Trials" (mobile) | |
| Announcement banner: "Veeva Announces Falcon, Agentic Labor for Drug Development" | |
| "Mike Ehlers joins Formation Bio as Chief Scientific Officer and Head of R&D" announcement banner |
Mobile web
68FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
123- Long hero paragraph — Eight lines of desktop-length body copy push the primary CTA below the first viewport.
- Six-line serif headline — Headline wraps across six lines with the eyebrow, eating most of the fold before the value prop finishes.
- Two-line eyebrow text — Letter-spaced all-caps eyebrow wraps to two lines, adding vertical bulk before the headline starts.
CTA
72FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
Problems
- 'Request' feels like asking, not getting
- nav 'Partner With Us' competes
- no payoff implied in the click
- arrow-only submit cue adds nothing
Value props
76FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Astraea’s headline sells
Smarter, faster, safer clinical trials with agentic AI.
From protocol design to FDA submission, Astraea automates clinical data workflows with multi-agent AI — deployed inside your own environment, where your data never leaves and we never see it. Faster cycles, lower costs, and audit-ready comp
Working
- Subhead nails data-privacy fear head-on
- Scope is concrete: protocol to FDA submission
- 30–50% biometrics stat adds proof
Could improve
- Headline adjectives are generic
- Pill image decorates, doesn't demo product
- Key stat buried in corner chip
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
1234- Partner With Us button — Same black weight as Request a Demo, splitting the primary CTA scan to the opposite corner.
- Explore the Platform button — Equal-size secondary button beside the demo CTA dilutes the single action the fold wants.
- Five-item nav row — Platform, Solutions, Compare, About, Contact plus dropdowns offer five exits before the pitch lands.
- 30–50% stat card — Proof stat is clipped at the fold edge, weakening the one quantified claim on the page.