QFEXYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

90807060504030Ostium 78 on Jul 28 (Live)Gains Network (gTrade) 75 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Gains Network (gTrade) 44 on Jun 6 (Wayback)Gains Network (gTrade) 78 on Sep 2 (Wayback)Gains Network (gTrade) 77 on Sep 20 (Live)GMX 67 on Mar 6 (Wayback)GMX 69 on May 30 (Wayback)GMX 79 on Aug 29 (Live)QFEX 57 on Sep 21 (Live)Sep 21

Trust

34Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

GMX
Ostium
Gains Network (gTrade)
Trust read
QFEXNo visible trust signal identified.
OstiumInvestor logo strip (Coinbase Ventures, General Catalyst, GSR, Jump, LocalGlobe, Wintermute) with a real trading UI scre
Gains Network (gTrade)Stats bar: "Total Volume $110B+ · Total Trades 3M+ · Total Users 38k+ · Pairs 290+"
GMXStats row: "Traders 747K · Open interest $71M · Total volume $380B"

Mobile web

48Poor

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Start trading button — Primary CTA sits three panels down and is desktop-proportioned, not full-width for thumbs.
  2. How markets headline — Overlaps the MSFT/GOOGL ticker rows, making the value statement hard to read.

Value props

62Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

QFEX’s headline vagueHow markets should be.The first 24/7 exchange only for US equities, commodities and FX.

Working

  • Subhead names real differentiator: 24/7
  • "First" claim creates category ownership
  • Ticker imagery signals live markets

Could improve

  • Headline says nothing about the product
  • No user outcome or benefit stated
  • Hero shows a 1980s floor, not QFEX itself

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

QFEX
Ostium
Gains Network (gTrade)
GMX

Problems

  • two competing labels: Start trading / Trade now
  • 'trading' implies funded-account commitment
  • hero button small vs giant headline
  • no echo of 'How markets should be' headline

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Split value proposition — Subline sits bottom-left of panel one while the headline lives in panel three, forcing the eye to stitch the message together.
  2. How markets headline — Placed bottom-right outside the natural top-left scan path, so the core promise reads last instead of first.
  3. Trade now button — Same white-pill weight as 'Start trading' below but with a different label, splitting the primary action into two.
  4. Dense ticker boards — Dozens of same-weight ticker rows dominate the fold and out-shout the headline and CTA they should frame.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop