Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Leeroo ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Score over time
Trust
52FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.



| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Leeroo | "48 HOURS · READ-ONLY · FREE" risk-reversal line under the "Request a free audit" CTA |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| Client logo strip featuring AAA, Cleveland Clinic, Hyatt, Kirkland & Ellis, Francisco Partners, FIS, and Koch | |
| Fractal's Vaidya.ai powers BMC Health AI Chatbot on WhatsApp for Mumbai | |
| Sierra Agent chat demo resolving "I don't recognize this $95 charge" and booking "Appointment booked" | |
| Logo wall with Hitachi, Wipro, KPMG, PwC, ADP, AMS, Artico, NTT Data |
Mobile web
68FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
123- Headline wrap — The desktop headline scales down into six cramped lines, pushing both CTAs and the outcomes table far down the page.
- Request a free audit — Primary CTA sits below the first viewport and is only ~half-width instead of a full-bleed, thumb-friendly button.
- Read the specification — Secondary button stacks directly under the primary at near-equal visual weight, competing for the tap.
CTA
78FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Problems
- 'Request' implies waiting, not value
- nav label differs: 'Opportunity Audit'
- 4 words, slightly long
Value props
78FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
A living model of your business. Built by AI. Run in your cloud.
Uniforge, our platform, connects to every system you operate, learns your business into one living model, and ships agents that turn it into outcomes.
Working
- Ticker shows quantified outcomes: +$412K, 18,304
- 'Run in Leeroo's cloud' pre-answers security objection
- '48 HOURS · READ-ONLY · FREE' de-risks the CTA
Could improve
- 'Outcomes' is vague — name revenue/churn wins
- 'Living model' needs a beat to parse
- No emotional hook for the buyer's pain
Information hierarchy
82StrongDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
1234- Duplicate audit CTAs — "Request Opportunity Audit" in the nav and "Request a free audit" in the hero are the same action with different labels, forcing the visitor to reconcile them.
- Read the specification button — Styled at near-equal weight beside the primary CTA, it splits the click between converting and reading docs.
- Watch the demo link — An exit path embedded inside the proof ticker pulls attention away from the audit action at the moment of highest conviction.
- Faded top ticker row — The washed-out "Cross-sell ARR added" row reads as disabled or broken rather than an animation state.
