Klavis AIYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

85807570656055Locus 62 on Sep 22 (Live)Composio 70 on Feb 25 (Wayback)Composio 75 on Mar 25 (Wayback)Composio 79 on May 19 (Wayback)Composio 78 on Jun 8 (Wayback)Composio 79 on Jun 26 (Wayback)Composio 79 on Jul 10 (Wayback)Composio 78 on Jul 28 (Live)Pipedream 71 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Pipedream 72 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Pipedream 62 on Jul 23 (Wayback)Pipedream 72 on Aug 6 (Wayback)Pipedream 74 on Aug 30 (Wayback)Pipedream 77 on Sep 12 (Wayback)Pipedream 78 on Sep 20 (Live)Zapier MCP 77 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Zapier MCP 81 on May 6 (Wayback)Zapier MCP 77 on Jun 3 (Wayback)Zapier MCP 78 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Zapier MCP 78 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Zapier MCP 80 on Aug 14 (Live)Smithery 63 on Apr 1 (Wayback)Smithery 68 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Smithery 68 on Jun 8 (Wayback)Smithery 67 on Jul 7 (Wayback)Smithery 67 on Aug 10 (Wayback)Smithery 67 on Sep 5 (Wayback)Smithery 65 on Sep 20 (Live)Klavis AI 74 on Mar 25 (Wayback)Klavis AI 68 on Apr 3 (Wayback)Klavis AI 69 on Apr 18 (Wayback)Klavis AI 65 on Jul 3 (Wayback)Klavis AI 68 on Sep 20 (Live)Mar 25Apr 3Apr 18Jul 3Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202668LiveOverall +3 · Trust +7 · Value props +6Viewing
  2. Jul 3, 202665Overall −4 · Value props −10 · Trust −10View →
  3. Apr 18, 202669Overall +1 · Information hierarchy +4View →
  4. Apr 3, 202668Overall −6 · CTA −24 · Trust −10View →
  5. Mar 25, 202674First tracked report — strongest CTA 86, weakest Information hierarchy 68View →

Trust

55Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Klavis AI
Zapier MCP
Composio
Pipedream
Smithery
Trust read
Klavis AI"Backed by Y Combinator" badge with GitHub "5.8k ★" pill above the headline
LocusMCP install widget with real command "claude mcp add --transport http locus-pro" and "OAUTH · NO API KEYS" label
ComposioCustomer logo strip: HubSpot, wabi, agent.ai, Zoom
Pipedream"A Workday Company" mark under the Pipedream logo
Zapier MCP"Trusted by the world's best companies" logo wall (NVIDIA, Google, Meta, Lowe's, Allstate, Samsung, Mastercard, HP, Expe
SmitheryMCP server cards with usage counts, e.g. "Exa Search — 9.18k uses" and "OneSignal — 22.49k uses"

CTA

62Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Klavis AI
Locus
Pipedream
Zapier MCP
Composio
Smitheryin-product action

Problems

  • click feels costly — sales call
  • no value promised for the click
  • competes with header 'Sign Up'
  • generic label, ignores headline

Value props

68Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Klavis AI’s headline undersellsHigh Quality Coding & Agentic DataLong-horizon tasks, programmatic verification, and granular rewards

Working

  • Subhead names three concrete differentiators
  • Category is instantly clear to target buyers
  • YC + GitHub star badges add credibility

Could improve

  • 'High Quality' is an unbacked adjective
  • No dataset scale or numbers anywhere
  • Empty hero — nothing shows the data itself

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Sign Up button — Styled identically to the primary CTA color, splitting the visitor between 'Sign Up' and 'Contact Us'.
  2. GitHub stars badge — Outbound GitHub link sits directly above the headline, inviting an exit before the value prop lands.
  3. Contact Us CTA — 'Contact Us' reads as a support link, not a conversion action, weakening the fold's single scan-path anchor.

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Contact Us button — Desktop-proportioned button floats at ~60% width instead of a full-bleed thumb target.
  2. Header Sign Up button — Competes with the hero's Contact Us for the first tap, splitting the primary action.