AdentrisYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

80706050CodaMetrix 67 on Sep 22 (Live)Nym Health 64 on Apr 10 (Wayback)Nym Health 64 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Nym Health 65 on May 4 (Wayback)Nym Health 66 on May 13 (Wayback)Nym Health 66 on Jul 7 (Wayback)Nym Health 68 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Nym Health 67 on Sep 22 (Live)MDaudit 56 on Apr 1 (Wayback)MDaudit 55 on Apr 12 (Wayback)MDaudit 55 on Apr 20 (Wayback)MDaudit 64 on May 20 (Wayback)MDaudit 63 on Sep 22 (Live)Fathom 73 on Apr 1 (Wayback)Fathom 73 on Apr 24 (Wayback)Fathom 72 on May 7 (Wayback)Fathom 73 on May 19 (Wayback)Fathom 74 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Fathom 75 on Sep 22 (Live)AKASA 66 on Apr 22 (Wayback)AKASA 62 on Apr 30 (Wayback)AKASA 63 on May 20 (Wayback)AKASA 64 on Jun 13 (Wayback)AKASA 60 on Jul 10 (Wayback)AKASA 63 on Sep 7 (Wayback)AKASA 64 on Sep 22 (Live)Adentris 68 on Sep 8 (Wayback)Adentris 69 on Sep 22 (Live)Sep 8Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202669LiveOverall +1 · CTA −12 · Mobile web +10Viewing
  2. Sep 8, 202668First tracked report — strongest Value props 78, weakest Trust 58View →

Trust

58Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Adentris
Fathom
CodaMetrix
Trust read
Adentris"73 → 96% documentation accuracy pre-submission, customer data" outcome stat
CodaMetrix"2026 Best in KLAS for Autonomous Medical Coding" award banner with badge
Nym HealthNo visible trust signal identified.
MDauditNo visible trust signal identified.
FathomKLAS banner: "Fathom earns highest overall score"
AKASANo visible trust signal identified.

CTA

64Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Adentris
Nym Health
Fathom
MDaudit

Problems

  • demo request feels costly
  • free offer demoted to ghost button
  • nav primary conflicts with hero primary

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Six-line subhead paragraph — Desktop-length copy fills half the viewport and pushes the primary CTA far down the fold.
  2. Side-by-side CTA pair — Two half-width buttons compete; neither is the thumb-friendly full-bleed tap target mobile deserves.
  3. Truncated stat labels — The 73→96% and −62% stats wrap into cramped columns and clip mid-word at the fold edge.

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Dueling hero CTAs — Request a demo and Start for Free sit side by side at similar size, splitting the one action the fold wants.
  2. Header Start for Free — Primary-styled pill duplicates the hero's secondary action, pulling scans to the top-right before the value prop lands.
  3. Seven-item nav row — Home through Company offers seven equal-weight exits before the visitor reaches any conversion action.
  4. Overlapping mockup toast — The Documentation integrity popup covers the module list, cluttering the mockup's left rail and muddying its story.

Value props

82Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Adentris’s headline sellsThe AI platform for revenue integrity and compliance.Continuously audit every chart, every claim, and every prior auth in real time, across any EHR, with no integration project required. Hospitals, health systems, and behavioral health networks use Adentris to recover revenue, prevent denials

Working

  • Concrete stats: 96% accuracy, −62% denials
  • Subhead kills the integration objection
  • Hero image shows real claim audits + dollars

Could improve

  • Headline is category, not outcome
  • "AI platform for" is generic framing
  • Subhead runs long; two sentences dense