Mirrors Landing Page Growth Score | YC F26

← Back to YC F26

Mirrorshttps://www.runmirrors.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Mirrors ranks

1.Zep78
2.Mem078
3.Zetta (Supermemory-style) Supermemory75
4.Mirrors69
5.Letta52

Fix Trust

69Growth scoreupdated Sep 20, 2026

category scores

Trust44 CTA68 Value props72 Mobile web76 Information hierarchy86

category scoresShowHide

Trust44 CTA68 Value props72 Mobile web76 Information hierarchy86

Score over time

Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports

Sep 20, 202669LiveOverall −4 · Trust −14 · Information hierarchy +10Viewing
Aug 1, 202673Overall −4 · CTA −8 · Information hierarchy −6View →
Jul 6, 202677First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 82, weakest Trust 58View →

Trust

44Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

	Trust read
Mirrors	"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline
Zep	"TRUSTED BY AI TEAMS" logo wall with Samsung, Zscaler, HoneYBOOK, Quorum, and AGI, Inc.
Mem0	GitHub star badge showing "61,868" stars in the nav
Letta	Research listing "Memory Models: Towards Agents That Learn — JUN 2026"
Zetta (Supermemory-style) Supermemory	"Used by the best teams" logo strip (Caret, Jinso, Moonage, Endearing, ChatNow)

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Problems

click feels like a meeting, not value
four words, over the 3-word ideal
no payoff named in the label

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Mirrors’s headline sellsDon't let the same agent mistake reach another customer.You've already told your agent what went wrong. We're building Mirrors to carry that correction into its next decision, even in a long-running task.

Working

Names a specific, felt pain: repeat agent mistakes
Subhead explains the mechanism plainly
"We're building" sets honest early-stage framing

Could improve

No numbers or measurable outcome anywhere
Hero art decorates, doesn't demonstrate
Proof limited to YC badge and vague partner chip

Mobile web

76Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture

Header CTA overlap — The nav "Talk to the founders" button overlaps the mirrors wordmark and duplicates the hero CTA below.
Hero CTA width — The primary button sits at roughly half the column width instead of a near-full-bleed thumb target.

Information hierarchy

86Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture

Duplicate header CTA — Styled identically to the hero's "Talk to the founders" button, splitting one action into two equal-weight targets.
Four-link nav row — "How it works", "What we're building", "Design partners", and "FAQ" are four exits competing with the single conversion.
Design partners strip — "Early design partners" link creeps into the fold as another same-weight exit below the hero CTA.