SpecificYC F25 landing page report.
← Back to YC F25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Specific ranks

  1. 1.Render80
  2. 2.Specific77
  3. 3.Railway74
  4. 4.Fly.io74
  5. 5.Vercel70
Fix Trust

Score over time

858075706560Railway 74 on Jun 29 (Wayback)Railway 75 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Railway 75 on Jul 28 (Wayback)Railway 75 on Aug 12 (Wayback)Railway 74 on Aug 25 (Wayback)Railway 77 on Sep 10 (Wayback)Railway 74 on Sep 22 (Live)Render 76 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Render 78 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Render 72 on Jul 14 (Wayback)Render 76 on Jul 28 (Wayback)Render 71 on Aug 12 (Wayback)Render 77 on Sep 9 (Wayback)Render 80 on Sep 22 (Live)Fly.io 66 on Jun 24 (Wayback)Fly.io 70 on Jul 11 (Wayback)Fly.io 70 on Jul 24 (Wayback)Fly.io 67 on Aug 7 (Wayback)Fly.io 72 on Aug 23 (Wayback)Fly.io 71 on Sep 6 (Wayback)Fly.io 74 on Sep 20 (Live)Vercel 73 on Jun 30 (Wayback)Vercel 73 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Vercel 72 on Jul 29 (Wayback)Vercel 72 on Aug 11 (Wayback)Vercel 67 on Aug 25 (Wayback)Vercel 68 on Sep 9 (Wayback)Vercel 70 on Sep 22 (Live)Specific 76 on Apr 13 (Wayback)Specific 78 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Specific 78 on May 7 (Wayback)Specific 75 on May 15 (Wayback)Specific 77 on Sep 22 (Live)Apr 13Apr 21May 7May 15Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202677LiveOverall +2 · Trust +10 · Information hierarchy +4Viewing
  2. May 15, 202675Overall −3 · Information hierarchy −10 · Trust −8View →
  3. May 7, 202678CTA −4 · Trust +4View →
  4. Apr 21, 202678Overall +2 · Information hierarchy +6 · CTA +4View →
  5. Apr 13, 202676First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 88, weakest Trust 66View →

Trust

68Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Specific
Render
Trust read
Specific"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline
RailwayCustomer logo wall (Tripadvisor, Cognizant, Mercado Libre, G2X, Reducto, Automattic) on the mobile fold
RenderTRUSTED BY OVER 7 MILLION BUILDERS
Fly.ioCustomer logo wall: Kilocode, Builder.io, Hatchet, Phonic, Supabase, Firecrawl, Plastic Labs, Replicate, Steel, Delos (m
VercelCustomer logo row: OpenAI, DoorDash, Charles Schwab, Supreme, The Weather Company, Polymarket, Blackbox.ai

CTA

76Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Specific
Render

Problems

  • 5 words — over 3-word ideal
  • no visible free/zero-cost cue
  • arrow icon adds no meaning

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Nav links and Dashboard — Five equal-weight exits (Docs, Changelog, Pricing, Get in touch, Dashboard) sit above the headline and compete with the sole conversion path.
  2. Get started CTA — The primary CTA floats right of the subtext, off the left-aligned scan path the headline and copy establish.
  3. View Config button — A clickable-looking control inside the product mock adds a false affordance near the fold's visual center.

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Specific’s headline sellsThe cloud platform built for coding agentsSpecific lets your coding agent both write code and build infrastructure to run it. Build from scratch and deploy to production in minutes.

Working

  • Names the exact audience: coding agents
  • Subhead states mechanism plus outcome
  • Hero image shows real deployed services

Could improve

  • No concrete numbers or proof points
  • 'In minutes' is vague — quantify it
  • No named stacks or infra primitives

Mobile web

86Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Four-line subheadline — Wraps into four lines and pushes the primary CTA toward the bottom of the first viewport.
  2. Dashboard sidebar text — Desktop-scale screenshot text like "Secrets & Config" is too small to read on a phone.
  3. Cropped service nodes — The "api" node is cut off at the right edge, making the diagram read as broken on mobile.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop