SF Tensor Landing Page Growth Score | YC F25

← Back to YC F25

SF Tensorhttps://sf-tensor.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How SF Tensor ranks

Fix Trust

76Growth scoreupdated Sep 22, 2026

category scores

Trust52 CTA72 Value props82 Information hierarchy84 Mobile web88

category scoresShowHide

Trust52 CTA72 Value props82 Information hierarchy84 Mobile web88

Score over time

Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports

Sep 22, 202676LiveOverall +2 · CTA −4 · Value props +4Viewing
Sep 11, 202674Overall +18 · Mobile web +32 · Value props +26View →
Jun 18, 202656Overall +2 · Information hierarchy +4 · Trust +4View →
Jun 9, 202654CTA −6 · Trust +6View →
May 18, 202654Overall −7 · CTA −14 · Trust −10View →
Apr 16, 202661First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 72, weakest Trust 52View →

Trust

52Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

	Trust read
SF Tensor	Product screenshot of the SF Tensor run console with real training logs ("Train Epoch: 1 [0/60000 (0%)] Loss: 2.299024")
Foundry (ML Foundry)	"See live prices →" link implying an inspectable live marketplace
Together AI	"TRUSTED BY" logo strip with Cohere, DeepMind, LG AI Research, VFS.Global, ElevenLabs
SkyPilot	Customer logo wall including NVIDIA, Meta, Amazon Robotics, Point72, and Mistral AI beneath the hero CTAs
Mosaic AI (Databricks Mosaic)	"TRUSTED BY DATA + AI TEAMS" logo bar with AT&T, Block, OpenAI, Burberry, FDA, Heineken
Lightning AI	"Trusted by 450,000+ devs and AI teams" with Runway and Supercell logos (mobile fold)

CTA

72Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Problems

'Plan' feels like a sales process
four words, over 3-word ideal
no zero-commitment signal

Value props

82Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

SF Tensor’s headline sellsTrain the models only you can build.Bring your model and data. We compile the kernels, find the cheapest capable hardware across providers and operate the run, from 1 GPU to 10,000.

Working

Subhead names the full workflow concretely
Real scale number: 1 GPU to 10,000
Screenshot shows an actual training run

Could improve

H1 is emotive but not descriptive
No proof points or customer evidence
'Cheapest capable' lacks a number

Information hierarchy

84Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture

Duplicate nav CTA — Repeats the hero's "Plan a training run" at equal blue weight, splitting the single-action focus.
Talk to an engineer — Plain black text next to the primary button reads as an unstyled afterthought rather than a clear secondary path.
Product screenshot text — Terminal log copy inside the screenshot is too small to communicate anything at fold size.

Mobile web

88Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture

Headline off first viewport — The hero stack pushes the product screenshot and any proof entirely below the fold; the headline sits low with the nav-to-headline gap dominated by the header offset.
Product screenshot too small — The dashboard image shrinks the desktop UI to phone width, making the run logs and 'Run Details' panel unreadable and adding no information.