ScoopYC F25 landing page report.
← Back to YC F25
Scoophttps://scooplabs.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

How Scoop ranks

  1. 1.Yseop73
  2. 2.AI Rx (Artos)67
  3. 3.Weave Bio66
  4. 4.Scoop58
  5. 5.Certara CoAuthor58
Fix CTA
58Growth scoreupdated

category scores

CTA30Information hierarchy58Mobile web58Trust62Value props82
category scoresShowHide
CTA30Information hierarchy58Mobile web58Trust62Value props82

Score over time

8070605040Weave Bio 58 on Apr 11 (Wayback)Weave Bio 55 on Apr 18 (Wayback)Weave Bio 52 on May 9 (Wayback)Weave Bio 59 on Jul 18 (Wayback)Weave Bio 66 on Sep 22 (Live)Certara CoAuthor 59 on Jul 1 (Wayback)Certara CoAuthor 60 on Jul 9 (Wayback)Certara CoAuthor 59 on Aug 2 (Wayback)Certara CoAuthor 58 on Aug 14 (Wayback)Certara CoAuthor 58 on Aug 24 (Wayback)Certara CoAuthor 58 on Sep 7 (Wayback)Certara CoAuthor 58 on Sep 21 (Live)AI Rx (Artos) 64 on May 21 (Wayback)AI Rx (Artos) 67 on Sep 22 (Live)Yseop 58 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Yseop 73 on Aug 26 (Wayback)Yseop 73 on Sep 20 (Live)Scoop 73 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Scoop 76 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Scoop 57 on Jul 22 (Wayback)Scoop 58 on Sep 22 (Live)Apr 21Jun 9Jul 22Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202658LiveOverall +1 · Mobile web +6 · CTA −5Viewing
  2. Jul 22, 202657Overall −19 · CTA −33 · Mobile web −28View →
  3. Jun 9, 202676Overall +3 · Value props +6 · CTA +5View →
  4. Apr 21, 202673First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 82, weakest Trust 62View →

CTA

30Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

AI Rx (Artos)
Yseop
Weave Bio
Certara CoAuthor

Problems

  • no CTA anywhere in the fold
  • screenshot replaces the action
  • nav 'Contact Us' is only exit
  • no path into the product

Information hierarchy

58Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture12
  1. Four-link nav row — Every clickable element in the fold is an exit path; no conversion action balances the nav.
  2. Dense product screenshot — Module rows and comment threads are illegible at this scale, so the proof reads as noise instead of evidence.

Mobile web

58Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Illegible product screenshot — Desktop dashboard shrunk to phone width renders every label at unreadable micro-type.
  2. Clipped logo strip — Social-proof logos bleed off both edges, cutting the first logo mid-word.

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Scoop
Yseop
Trust read
Scoop"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the hero headline
Weave BioPress Release: Weave Bio Announces Collaboration with Takeda
Certara CoAuthor"Certara Accelerates Drug Discovery and Development with NVIDIA BioNeMo Agent Toolkit" news card
AI Rx (Artos)"A Y Combinator company" badge above the headline
YseopCustomer logo strip: Bayer, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi

Value props

82Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Scoop’s headline sellsSubmit INDs in Days, Not MonthsAI-native drafting and continuous maintenance for pre-clinical regulatory submissions.

Working

  • Days-not-months names the real pain
  • Subhead states mechanism plainly
  • Hero shows the actual IND workspace

Could improve

  • No proof backing the speed claim
  • "AI-native" leans on buzzword
  • No numbers beyond the time contrast

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Yseopyseop.com73 #2AI Rx (Artos)artosai.com67 #3Weave Bioweave.bio66
#4Scoop58
#5Certara CoAuthorcertara.com58