Piggy RoboticsYC F25 landing page report.
← Back to YC F25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Piggy Robotics ranks

  1. 1.Figure68
  2. 2.1X Technologies67
  3. 3.Unitree Robotics54
  4. 4.Piggy Robotics46
Fix Trust

Score over time

8070605040301X Technologies 68 on Apr 1 (Wayback)1X Technologies 39 on Apr 17 (Wayback)1X Technologies 65 on Apr 30 (Wayback)1X Technologies 67 on May 16 (Wayback)1X Technologies 67 on May 26 (Wayback)1X Technologies 68 on Jun 25 (Wayback)1X Technologies 67 on Jul 24 (Live)Figure 66 on Jun 13 (Wayback)Figure 67 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Figure 62 on Jul 11 (Wayback)Figure 65 on Jul 27 (Wayback)Figure 65 on Aug 9 (Wayback)Figure 69 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Figure 68 on Sep 20 (Live)Unitree Robotics 54 on Sep 20 (Live)Piggy Robotics 48 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Piggy Robotics 45 on Sep 2 (Wayback)Piggy Robotics 46 on Sep 22 (Live)Jun 15Sep 2Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202646LiveOverall +1 · CTA +6Viewing
  2. Sep 2, 202645Overall −3 · Trust −6 · Mobile web −6View →
  3. Jun 15, 202648First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 68, weakest Trust 28View →

Trust

22Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Unitree Robotics
1X Technologies
Trust read
Piggy RoboticsNo visible trust signal identified.
1X TechnologiesHero photography of the NEO robot in three colorways
Figureimplicit context Figure may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
Unitree RoboticsMobile spec line "Ultra-wide 4D LIDAR、Stronger performance、New Creature of Embodied AI" under "Infinite Revolution" with

Value props

38Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Piggy Robotics’s headline undersellspiggy roboticshumanoid robots for the home

Working

  • Subhead names the real category
  • No overclaiming or buzzword stack
  • Copy is instantly readable

Could improve

  • Headline is just the company name
  • No outcome, chore, or benefit named
  • Hero visual shows nothing of product

CTA

48Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Piggy Robotics
1X Technologies
Figure

Problems

  • raw email address, no action verb
  • click outcome unclear
  • emailing feels high-cost
  • no payoff or value promised

Information hierarchy

62Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture12
  1. Founders email box — Ghost-bordered, low-contrast, verb-less — the sole action reads as a label, not a clickable CTA.
  2. Tagline highlight box — Grey serif text on a grey panel is low contrast and its style clashes with the sans-serif wordmark.

Mobile web

62Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Email CTA button — Thin ghost outline on a dark background reads as decoration, not a tappable action.
  2. Tagline banner — Low-contrast gray-on-gray serif text in a faint box is hard to read on a phone.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop