Forge RoboticsYC F25 landing page report.
← Back to YC F25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Forge Robotics ranks

  1. 1.Forge Robotics70
  2. 2.Hadrian62
  3. 3.Bright Machines58
  4. 4.Isembard56
Fix Trust

Score over time

80706050403020Bright Machines 55 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Bright Machines 52 on Aug 9 (Wayback)Bright Machines 58 on Sep 22 (Live)Isembard 66 on May 9 (Wayback)Isembard 68 on May 17 (Wayback)Isembard 68 on Jul 22 (Wayback)Isembard 56 on Sep 20 (Live)Hadrian 60 on Apr 3 (Wayback)Hadrian 33 on May 4 (Wayback)Hadrian 62 on Sep 20 (Live)Forge Robotics 70 on Sep 22 (Live)Sep 22

Trust

44Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
Forge RoboticsPhotorealistic robotic arm product image beneath the hero
Bright MachinesNo visible trust signal identified.
IsembardNo visible trust signal identified.
HadrianMulti-location timezone bar listing CA, AZ, AL, and DC facilities with live local times

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Forge Robotics’s headline sellsModular Autonomous Factories, built to scale.Forge Robotics is building Modular Autonomous Factories. Shipping container sized modules that can manufacture anything. Snap them together to scale capacity without scaling headcount.

Working

  • Concrete 'shipping container' mental model
  • 'Without scaling headcount' names real outcome
  • Category-defining, not buzzword soup

Could improve

  • No numbers anywhere in the fold
  • 'Manufacture anything' is unproven overclaim
  • Hero image shows a part, not the modular system

CTA

76Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Forge Robotics

Problems

  • 4 words, past single-fixation ideal
  • nav says 'Virtual Tour', hero differs
  • tour is a demo, not product entry

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Hero headline wrap — Desktop-sized type wraps into four uneven lines with 'scale.' orphaned on its own line.
  2. Virtual tour pill — Monospace eyebrow wraps to two lines, duplicating the CTA's message and crowding the headline.
  3. Body paragraph block — Seven lines of body copy push the primary CTA toward the bottom of the fold.

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Header Virtual Tour button — Duplicates the hero's primary CTA in the same orange, splitting the fold's one action across two targets.
  2. Explore products button — Secondary button sits at near-equal size beside the primary CTA, pulling clicks away from the tour.
  3. Four dropdown nav items — Four expandable menus above the hero multiply exit paths before the visitor reaches the CTA.