CCH Axcess Tax (Wolters Kluwer)https://wolterskluwer.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.

How CCH Axcess Tax (Wolters Kluwer) ranks

  1. 1.CCH Axcess Tax (Wolters Kluwer)44
Fix Value props
44Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Value props34Mobile web34
category scoresShowHide
Value props34Mobile web34

Value props

34Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

CCH Axcess Tax (Wolters Kluwer)’s headline vagueAI-powered solutions … professio…

Working

  • Signals AI investment
  • Clean, uncluttered hero canvas
  • OpenAI news banner adds credibility

Could improve

  • Headline fits any B2B vendor
  • No subhead or proof points
  • Hero image decorates, shows nothing

Mobile web

34Poor

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Cookie consent modal — Dead blocker covering ~80% of the first viewport; nine lines of legal copy with no conversion-valuable CTA.
  2. Learn More button — Only visible CTA is a low-contrast ghost button on black, half-hidden beneath the consent modal.
  3. Hero image area — Mobile hero shows only the pencil imagery with no headline or value statement before the modal takes over.

Trust

45Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

CCH Axcess Tax (Wolters Kluwer) desktop capture for Trust

How CCH Axcess Tax (Wolters Kluwer) compares

Trust read

Information hierarchy

48Poor

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

CCH Axcess Tax (Wolters Kluwer) desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

CTA

61Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

CCH Axcess Tax (Wolters Kluwer)

How CCH Axcess Tax (Wolters Kluwer) compares

Recommended rewrites