Protege Growth Score: 62/100

Lazyweb

Protegehttps://withprotege.ai/

Complete both scorecards to calculate your growth score.

—Overall growth scoreupdated Jul 28, 2026

Funnel

Acquire

Activate

Coming soon

Monetize

Coming soon

Retain / Reengage

Coming soon

Graded against Lazyweb’s growth rubrics.

Protegehttps://withprotege.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Protege ranks

Fix Trust

62Growth scoreupdated Jul 28, 2026

category scores

Trust38 Value props55 CTA61 Information hierarchy73 Mobile web85

category scoresShowHide

Trust38 Value props55 CTA61 Information hierarchy73 Mobile web85

Score over time

Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports

Jul 28, 202662LiveOverall −1 · Information hierarchy −5 · Value props +5Viewing
Jul 4, 202663Overall +1 · Information hierarchy +4 · CTA +2View →
May 4, 202662Overall −1 · CTA −3 · Information hierarchy −2View →
Apr 15, 202663Overall +1 · Information hierarchy +2 · Trust +2View →
Apr 2, 202662Overall −1 · Trust −2View →
Mar 12, 202663Overall +1 · Mobile web +21 · CTA −6View →
Jan 31, 202662First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 74, weakest Trust 42View →

Trust

38Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

	Trust read
Protege	No visible trust signal identified.
San Francisco Data	No visible trust signal identified.
TollBit	Four-column capability grid naming concrete products: "Agent Site", "Portfolio analytics", "Licensed RAG access", "NLWeb
Datarade	"2600+ trusted data providers worldwide" in the hero subhead
Narrative	No visible trust signal identified.

Value props

55Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Protege’s headline vagueReal World Data for AI Development

Working

Clear category positioning in six words
Dual CTAs segment both marketplace sides
No buzzword abstraction stack

Could improve

No subhead — zero specifics on the fold
No numbers, proof, or data types named
Hero art decorates, doesn't demonstrate

CTA

61Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Problems

no action verb — reads as a label
routing copy, no value promised
addresses a persona, not the visitor
competes with nav 'CONTACT' button

Information hierarchy

73Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture

CONTACT nav button — Solid purple styling matches the primary 'FOR MODEL BUILDERS' CTA exactly, splitting the fold's one action into two competing buttons.
Hero headline block — 'Real World Data for AI Development' sits in the bottom-left corner, so the first scan hits nav and artwork before the value proposition.
Seven-item nav row — About, For Model Builders, For Data Providers, Articles, People, and DataLab all leak attention above the CTA, and two of them duplicate the fold's own buttons.

Mobile web

85Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

No specific callouts

Protege's mobile fold is disciplined: the nav collapses to a clean 'MENU' toggle plus a 'CONTACT' button, the 'Real World Data for AI Development' headline scales to two comfortable lines, and both routing CTAs — 'FOR MODEL BUILDERS' (filled purple, clearly primary) and 'FOR DATA PROVIDERS' — are full-width, thumb-friendly, and tappable in the first viewport. The only friction is the unlabeled chat-widget bubble pinned bottom-left, a dead blocker that overlaps the 'Protege is the trusted source' headline as the page scrolls. Removing or repositioning that chat bubble on mobile is the single biggest lever left for this category.