Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Vitess ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
44PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.





| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Vitess | GitHub, Slack, and Stack Overflow community icons in the top nav |
| "3M+ queries/s in production" caption above the Coinbase, Ramp, Modal, Bitstack, Reducto logo row | |
| Dated release notes with sha256 checksums and a transparent CVE-2025-12819 advisory detailing vulnerable configurations | |
| Code editor screenshot with tabs "game.ts", "characters.module.css", "bonus-level.ts" | |
| GitHub star count "12,779" in the header |
Value props
58FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Scalable. Reliable. MySQL-compatible. Cloud-native. Database.
Working
- MySQL-compatible is a concrete, targeted hook
- Accurately describes the category
- CTAs match developer intent (quickstart, docs)
Could improve
- No subhead — zero supporting specifics
- Adjective stack carries no outcome or numbers
- Logo-as-hero shows nothing the product does
Mobile web
62FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
64FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
64FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Vitess compares
Recommended rewrites
