Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Touchmark ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.





| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Touchmark | "Backed by Y Combinator" badge in the header |
| Logo strip featuring NVIDIA, Modal, Standard Intelligence, HeyGen, and MIT at the bottom of the fold | |
| Stats bar: "700K+ transactions/mo · 20,000+ GPUs · 40+ data centers · 68+ GPU types" | |
| Logo strip with yesnoerror, Pluralis Research, Princeton University, and Gensyn plus "Read Razer Case Study" link | |
| Customer logo strip (Tinfoil, Moises, Parasail, Berkeley) below the mobile hero |
Value props
58FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
touchmark
Market for AI model inference. Future capacity, bought today.
Working
- Subhead names category and mechanism
- "Bought today" implies concrete action
- No buzzword abstraction stack
Could improve
- H1 is just the brand name
- No numbers, prices, or proof points
- Hero visual decorates, shows no market
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
80StrongCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Touchmark compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
82StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
