Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How PVcase (with Anderson Optimization) ranks
- 1.
Power Factors71
- 2.
Invertix66
- 3.
PVcase (with Anderson Optimization)64
- 4.
Raptor Maps60
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
44PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.



| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| PVcase (with Anderson Optimization) | Banner: "EXPLORE THE DIGITAL 2026–2027 SOLAR INDUSTRY REPORT" — an owned industry report signaling domain expertise |
| "Backed by Y Combinator" badge beside the Book a demo CTA | |
| Banner: "New Case Study: What Does Rapid Response Look Like When Every Minute Matters?" | |
| Unity product dashboard screenshot with Monitor/Analyze/Report navigation and live-style charts |
Value props
62FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Solar that sees the light of day
Deliver faster, more accurate solar projects from site selection, to design, and yield estimation
Working
- Subhead names speed and accuracy outcomes
- Maps the full workflow: site to yield
- Segment tabs clarify audience fit
Could improve
- Headline is a pun, not a value claim
- No numbers or proof points in the fold
- Hero photo decorates, never shows product
Information hierarchy
68FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
72FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How PVcase (with Anderson Optimization) compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
72FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
