Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Patent Watch ranks
Trust
52FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.





| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Patent Watch | SEP Mapping claim-chart product UI with "Claim Element", "Standards Evidence", "AI Analysis" columns and "Meets" status |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| "TRUSTED BY" logo strip with Panasonic, JASCO, Aspen Aerogels, AUO, Stradling | |
| "RATED 5 STARS ON G2" badge with five stars above the headline | |
| Announcement bar: "Bringing LexisNexis® Global Patent Litigation Data into Solve Intelligence Workflows" | |
| "Trusted by 500+ law firms and in-house patent teams worldwide" with a customer logo strip (Dexcom, Constellium, Dickins |
CTA
62FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?




Problems
- demo booking feels costly
- no CTA in the hero itself
- casing drift: Demo vs demo
- small nav-sized button on desktop
Mobile web
64FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Value props
68FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
AI for Patent Intelligence.
Build defensible claim charts, assess essentiality and validity, and find the patents that matter.
Working
Could improve
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
