Findly (now Wobby-style AI data chat)https://findly.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.

How Findly (now Wobby-style AI data chat) ranks

  1. 1.Zenlytic73
  2. 2.Wren AI72
  3. 3.Findly (now Wobby-style AI data chat)67
  4. 4.Pleom67
  5. 5.Julius AI67
  6. 6.Fabi.ai60
Fix Value props
67Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Value props54Mobile web58
category scoresShowHide
Value props54Mobile web58

Value props

54Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Findly (now Wobby-style AI data chat)’s headline vagueBusiness Decisions with Advanced Reasoning AgentsHigh-value specialized analytics and forecasting

Working

  • Hero screenshot shows a real query in action
  • "Trusted by +8,000 users" adds proof
  • Strong backer badges (YC, Google Cloud)

Could improve

  • Headline is a verbless fragment
  • Subhead stacks abstractions, zero specifics
  • No outcome or emotion — what do users gain?

Mobile web

58Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Partner badge stack — Four wrapped badges consume the top of the fold and push the headline and CTA down.
  2. Cookie consent banner — Dead blocker with two buttons eating the bottom of the viewport; no conversion value.
  3. Client logo row — CyberArk and Skydio logos add a third trust layer between the subhead and the CTA.

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Findly (now Wobby-style AI data chat)

How Findly (now Wobby-style AI data chat) compares

Recommended rewrites

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Findly (now Wobby-style AI data chat) desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

Trust

82Strong

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Findly (now Wobby-style AI data chat) desktop capture for Trust

How Findly (now Wobby-style AI data chat) compares

Trust read