Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Exla ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
56FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.




| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Exla | "READING TRACES via MCP" panel showing query_traces / recent_deploys / query_logs walkthrough over a live trace log |
| Customer logo wall: Coinbase, DoorDash, Expedia Group, Snowflake, Zscaler | |
| "Cleric Named a Gartner® Cool Vendor in AI for SRE and Observability" banner plus the customer logo row (fubo, LaunchGoo | |
| Product UI screenshot: 'Production World Model™ — 1,749,612 total nodes, 30 node types' with details panel | |
| Incident timeline panel captioned "Real predictive detection on Herald production; sensitive details redacted." | |
| Banner: "Excited to announce that Deductive AI is joining forces with Elastic" |
Information hierarchy
68FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
123- Reading Traces panel — A dense dark terminal panel plus carousel copy and pager controls form a second focal zone competing with the headline and CTA.
- Hero Sign in button — Styled at near-equal weight beside Get started and duplicated in the nav, splitting the single conversion path.
- Five-step process nav — Detect/Investigate/Root cause/Fix/Verify sits at equal weight in the header, adding a fifth message strip before the headline is read.
CTA
72FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Exla compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
72FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Value props
92StrongTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Production broke at 3:07 AM. You get paged. Libra already investigated traces.
By 3:14 it had read the traces, named the deploy that caused it, and opened the fix PR with a regression test. Libra watches your logs, traces, and deploys around the clock. You review and merge in the morning.
Working
Could improve
