Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How DryRun Security ranks
- 1.
Corgea78
- 2.
DryRun Security73
- 3.
Semgrep72
- 4.
Snyk54
- 5.
Polymorph50
Trust
66FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| DryRun Security | Customer logo strip (Zepto, Tines, Gusto, Cloudera, Flex, Dematic) under "AI-Native code security trusted by leading eng |
| "backed by Y combinator" badge beneath the contact line | |
| G2 rating badge "4.6 (55 reviews)" on the mobile fold | |
| Banner: "Your AI coding assistant, security-tested. See where it ranks →" | |
| No visible trust signal identified. |
Mobile web
72FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
1234- Headline wraps five lines — "Secure and Remediate Code Risk Before It Ships" scales down too little and wraps into five tall lines, pushing the CTA toward the fold edge.
- Green promo banner — Sticky two-line "AI Office Hours" bar plus the header eats ~13% of the first viewport before the hero starts; it has no direct conversion CTA.
- Get Started button — Primary CTA sits at roughly half column width instead of near-full-bleed, smaller than the eyebrow pill above the headline.
- Eyebrow pill with arrow — "The Code Security Intelligence Platform" pill is styled like a tappable full-width button, competing with the real CTA below.
Value props
74FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
DryRun Security’s headline
Secure and Remediate Code Risk Before It Ships
The AI-native code security verification platform that understands your code, validates exploitable risk, guides remediation, and enforces policies across human and AI-generated code.
Working
Could improve
Information hierarchy
76FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve
CTA
76FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How DryRun Security compares
Recommended rewrites