Browserlesshttps://browserless.io/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Information hierarchy.

How Browserless ranks

  1. 1.Browserless79
  2. 2.Steel78
  3. 3.Browserbase76
  4. 4.KERNEL75
  5. 5.Anchor Browser73
  6. 6.Hyperbrowser73
Fix Information hierarchy
79Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Information hierarchy74CTA76
category scoresShowHide
Information hierarchy74CTA76

Information hierarchy

74Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Nav link cluster — Eight nav destinations plus GitHub badge, Contact Us, and Log In compete with Sign Up before the hero CTA is even seen.
  2. Sign Up button — A second conversion CTA in the nav splits weight with the hero's 'Get Browserless's API key' and blurs which action is primary.
  3. Read the Docs button — Styled at nearly the same footprint as the primary CTA, giving developers an equal-weight exit into documentation.

CTA

76Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Browserless
Steel
KERNEL
Browserbase

Problems

  • no 'free' despite free tier
  • 4 words, over the 3-word ideal
  • nav 'Sign Up' splits the label

Trust

76Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Browserless desktop capture for Trust

How Browserless compares

Trust read

Value props

84Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Browserless’s headlineThe web layer your agents run onBring your own agent and library, or run ours. Stealth, CAPTCHA, residential proxies, and authenticated profiles that persist and scale to thousands. Your agent gets in, and gets it done.

Working

Could improve

Mobile web

86Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Browserless mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve