Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.
How Braincube ranks
CTA
64FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?




Problems
- click buys a sales convo, not value
- vague — no payoff named
- header says 'CONTACT SALES' instead
- no echo of margin promise
Trust
68FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.


| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Braincube | Customer logo bar featuring Siemens, Bridgestone, International Paper, Kimberly-Clark, Norske Skog, GAF, Avril, Sappi, a |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| "TRUSTED BY:" logo strip with Johnson & Johnson, Shell, FCA, NOV, Sierra Nevada, Under Armour | |
| "Featured Webinar" card co-branded with Ultimo, naming speakers Erik Udstuen and Berend Booms | |
| "PRODUCTION EVENTS 45,362,241,991" live usage stats strip | |
| Logo bar: "Trusted by the world's best manufacturers and leaders in AI" with Toyota, Microsoft, Asian Paints, IPG, NVent |
Value props
72FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
TURN VARIABILITY INTO MARGIN
Continuously adapt operations to changing production conditions to reduce variability and protect margin across every plant, line, and shift.
Working
Could improve
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
78FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
