Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Bolt ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
44PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.





| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Bolt | Functional AI prompt box with Figma and GitHub import options showing real product entry points |
| From University of Oxford / Backed by Y Combinator badge strip | |
| Customer logo wall featuring Microsoft, PayPal, SoFi, Stripe, Zillow, Plaid, Adobe, and Atlassian | |
| Template gallery with real community usage counts — "Image Generation Playground · 6.6K · 734" | |
| Gallery of generated example websites (e.g. "PICKLA" storefront) beneath the Apps/[Websites]/Games/Tools filter |
Value props
72FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
What will you build today?
Create stunning apps & websites by chatting with AI.
Working
- Subhead states exactly what Bolt does
- Live prompt box shows the product working
- Use-case tiles make scope concrete
Could improve
- Headline is generic, claims nothing
- No numbers or proof points in fold
- No speed or effort promise stated
Mobile web
78FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
84StrongDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
86StrongCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Bolt compares
Recommended rewrites
