Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.
How Attention ranks
- 1.
Attention77
- 2.
Rilla72
- 3.
Aircover71
- 4.
Kanava AI66
- 5.
Siro65
CTA
72FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?


Problems
- generic label, no payoff named
- work-email gate adds cost feel
- no echo of headline promise
Trust
72FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Attention | "SUMMER 2026 LEADER ON G2" badge above the hero headline |
| Backed By Y Combinator badge | |
| Customer logo strip (Kohler, Neighborly, Groundworks) under "Trusted by leading sales teams in home improvement, home bu | |
| Customer logo strip: Jacuzzi, American Standard, Culligan, Optimum, KAG, Great Day Improvements, McGraw Hill | |
| "Trusted by revenue teams at" logo strip naming TelemetryTV, CrunchTime, Unravel Data, WalkMe, Owner.com, Heidi Health, |
Information hierarchy
76FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Value props
80StrongTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
AI agents that work your pipeline while you sell.
Every meeting, email, and sales interaction captured. The next move on every deal, drafted and done. You approve. Attention executes.
Working
Could improve
Mobile web
84StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
