Origami RoboticsYC W26 landing page report.
← Back to YC W26
Origami Roboticshttps://www.origami-robotics.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Origami Robotics ranks

  1. 1.Dexterity67
  2. 2.Sanctuary AI67
  3. 3.Physical Intelligence56
  4. 4.Origami Robotics50
  5. 5.Skild AI50
Fix Trust
50Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust30CTA48Value props48Information hierarchy62Mobile web62
category scoresShowHide
Trust30CTA48Value props48Information hierarchy62Mobile web62

Score over time

70605040Physical Intelligence 56 on Jul 24 (Live)Skild AI 50 on Jul 24 (Live)Dexterity 66 on Mar 27 (Wayback)Dexterity 65 on Apr 10 (Wayback)Dexterity 66 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Dexterity 66 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Dexterity 67 on Aug 22 (Wayback)Dexterity 66 on Sep 14 (Wayback)Dexterity 67 on Sep 20 (Live)Sanctuary AI 67 on Jul 24 (Live)Origami Robotics 48 on Apr 3 (Wayback)Origami Robotics 46 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Origami Robotics 47 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Origami Robotics 44 on Jun 18 (Wayback)Origami Robotics 45 on Jul 9 (Wayback)Origami Robotics 51 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Origami Robotics 50 on Sep 23 (Live)Apr 3Apr 19Jun 9Jun 18Jul 9Sep 4Sep 23
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 23, 202650LiveOverall −1 · CTA −10 · Information hierarchy +4Viewing
  2. Sep 4, 202651Overall +6 · Trust +12 · Information hierarchy +6View →
  3. Jul 9, 202645Overall +1 · Trust −8 · Information hierarchy +4View →
  4. Jun 18, 202644Overall −3 · Information hierarchy −4 · CTA −4View →
  5. Jun 9, 202647Overall +1 · Trust +7 · Value props +4View →
  6. Apr 19, 202646Overall −2 · CTA +25 · Trust −19View →
  7. Apr 3, 202648First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 58, weakest CTA 30View →

Trust

30Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Physical Intelligence
Trust read
Origami RoboticsNo visible trust signal identified.
Physical IntelligenceDated research timeline, e.g. "π0.7: a Steerable Model with Emergent Capabilities — April 16, 2026"
Skild AINo visible trust signal identified.
DexterityNo visible trust signal identified.
Sanctuary AINo visible trust signal identified.

CTA

48Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Origami Robotics
Dexterity
Sanctuary AI

Problems

  • points to blog, not product
  • ghost button, near-invisible
  • no product-intent CTA in fold
  • low contrast on beige texture

Value props

48Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Origami Robotics’s headline vagueBring Human Dexterity to RobotsWe are building general-purpose dexterous manipulation.

Working

  • Names the real domain: dexterity
  • Short, memorable headline
  • No inflated buzzword stack

Could improve

  • Subhead restates headline, adds nothing
  • No demo image or footage of the tech
  • Zero numbers, tasks, or outcomes named

Information hierarchy

62Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Embossed hero headline — Low-contrast debossed styling makes the core value prop nearly invisible against the textured background.
  2. READ OUR BLOG button — The sole CTA is a faint ghost button that routes to content instead of a conversion action.
  3. Faint subheadline text — Gray-on-gray monospace copy explaining the product barely clears legibility thresholds.

Mobile web

62Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Uncollapsed nav link row — Full desktop links (BLOG, CAREERS, CONTACT) squeezed beside the logo with cramped tap targets instead of a hamburger.
  2. READ OUR BLOG button — Desktop-proportioned ghost outline button — low contrast, not thumb-width, and routes to content rather than a conversion action.
  3. Embossed hero headline — Low-contrast debossed text makes the core value statement hard to read on a phone at arm's length.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Dexteritydexterity.ai67 #2Sanctuary AIsanctuary.ai67 #3Physical Intelligencephysicalintelligence.company56
#4Origami Robotics50
#5Skild AIskild.ai50—Nimble Roboticsnimble.aifailed