MendralYC W26 landing page report.
← Back to YC W26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Information hierarchy.

Fix Information hierarchy

Score over time

90807060504030Devin (Cognition) 77 on Jul 27 (Live)Factory 70 on Apr 1 (Wayback)Factory 70 on Apr 9 (Wayback)Factory 71 on Apr 28 (Wayback)Factory 71 on May 12 (Wayback)Factory 68 on Jul 3 (Wayback)Factory 68 on Jul 23 (Wayback)Factory 68 on Jul 28 (Live)Trunk 64 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Trunk 64 on Jun 13 (Wayback)Trunk 76 on Aug 27 (Live)Codegen 70 on Mar 4 (Wayback)Codegen 70 on Mar 15 (Wayback)Codegen 70 on Apr 6 (Wayback)Codegen 69 on Apr 20 (Wayback)Codegen 42 on May 13 (Wayback)Codegen 53 on Jun 18 (Wayback)Codegen 72 on Aug 2 (Live)Mendral 78 on Apr 6 (Wayback)Mendral 77 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Mendral 76 on May 2 (Wayback)Mendral 77 on May 16 (Wayback)Mendral 74 on Jun 6 (Wayback)Mendral 78 on Jul 24 (Wayback)Mendral 78 on Sep 21 (Live)Apr 6Apr 22May 2May 16Jun 6Jul 24Sep 21
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 21, 202678LiveInformation hierarchy −10 · CTA +4Viewing
  2. Jul 24, 202678Overall +4 · Information hierarchy +6 · Value props +6View →
  3. Jun 6, 202674Overall −3 · Trust −12 · CTA +4View →
  4. May 16, 202677Overall +1 · Mobile web −6 · CTA +4View →
  5. May 2, 202676Overall −1 · Information hierarchy −6 · Value props −4View →
  6. Apr 22, 202677Overall −1 · Mobile web −9 · Information hierarchy +4View →
  7. Apr 6, 202678First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 88, weakest CTA 72View →

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Anthropic announcement banner — Top-of-page banner announces the team is joining Anthropic, pulling attention and clicks away before the hero can convert.
  2. Duplicate CTA pair — "Try it on Mendral's repo" appears twice in the fold (nav and hero), splitting the visitor's action target instead of concentrating it.
  3. Live activity feed — Five same-weight cards with badges, timestamps, and body copy compete with the headline as a second dense reading task.
  4. PostHog repo link — Outbound proof link at the feed's foot is styled as a green pill, echoing the primary CTA color and inviting an exit.

Trust

76Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
Mendral"See 200+ merged Mendral PRs on PostHog's public repo" link beneath the live activity panel
Devin (Cognition)Embedded Devin session demo showing the task "Migrate all gradient text to #317CFF in both repos, then test" with real P
FactoryNo visible trust signal identified.
TrunkCustomer logo wall (Brex, Zillow, Faire, Cockroach Labs, Klaviyo, Retool, Google[x], Zipline) under "The CI reliability
CodegenTerminal demo running 'codegen search "summarize a PR"' with real directory results

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture1234
  1. Try it CTA — Stops at roughly half the column width instead of full-bleed, shrinking the thumb target.
  2. Anthropic announcement bar — Dark banner plus header consumes the top slice of the viewport before any value statement.
  3. Four-line body paragraph — Long copy block pushes both CTAs to the bottom edge of the first viewport.
  4. Truncated proof card — The 'Today on Mendral's team' card is cut off mid-item, leaving orphaned half-rendered content.

CTA

82Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Mendral

Problems

  • 4 words, past the 3-word ideal
  • no visible free/no-cost signal
  • filler word 'it' adds length

Value props

82Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Mendral’s headline sellsPlatform Engineering on Autopilot.Automating the DevOps work your engineers shouldn't be doing by hand. Supply chain security, flaky CI, slow builds, and anything else specific to your stack.

Working

  • Subhead names concrete DevOps pains
  • Feed hero shows real outcomes live
  • Verifiable proof: 200+ PRs on PostHog

Could improve

  • Headline has no number or outcome
  • 'Autopilot' leans on category jargon
  • Emotional payoff stays implicit