TamLabsYC W25 landing page report.
← Back to YC W25
TamLabshttps://tamlabs.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

How TamLabs ranks

  1. 1.Lindy79
  2. 2.Relevance AI70
  3. 3.CrewAI67
  4. 4.Sema4.ai63
  5. 5.Cognition (Devin)62
  6. 6.TamLabs35
Fix CTA
35Growth scoreupdated

category scores

CTA25Value props28Trust28Mobile web42Information hierarchy52
category scoresShowHide
CTA25Value props28Trust28Mobile web42Information hierarchy52

Score over time

10080604020Cognition (Devin) 65 on Apr 2 (Wayback)Cognition (Devin) 64 on Apr 13 (Wayback)Cognition (Devin) 65 on Apr 26 (Wayback)Cognition (Devin) 65 on May 13 (Wayback)Cognition (Devin) 64 on May 24 (Wayback)Cognition (Devin) 65 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Cognition (Devin) 62 on Jul 28 (Live)Lindy 79 on Jul 17 (Live)Lindy 82 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Lindy 78 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Lindy 81 on Sep 17 (Wayback)CrewAI 74 on Feb 12 (Wayback)CrewAI 74 on Feb 28 (Wayback)CrewAI 74 on Mar 10 (Wayback)CrewAI 67 on Jul 28 (Live)Relevance AI 64 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Relevance AI 66 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Relevance AI 69 on May 7 (Wayback)Relevance AI 72 on May 19 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Relevance AI 71 on Jun 18 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jul 28 (Live)Sema4.ai 57 on Feb 12 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 58 on Feb 21 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 50 on Mar 28 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 59 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 60 on May 12 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 63 on Jul 28 (Live)TamLabs 66 on May 15 (Wayback)TamLabs 64 on Jun 4 (Wayback)TamLabs 58 on Jun 15 (Wayback)TamLabs 35 on Sep 22 (Live)May 15Jun 4Jun 15Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202635LiveOverall −23 · CTA −41 · Value props −30Viewing
  2. Jun 15, 202658Overall −6 · Information hierarchy −20 · Mobile web −14View →
  3. Jun 4, 202664Overall −2 · Information hierarchy −8 · Trust +4View →
  4. May 15, 202666First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 86, weakest Trust 34View →

CTA

25Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Lindy
CrewAI
Relevance AI
Sema4.ai
Cognition (Devin)

Problems

  • no button or input anywhere
  • only action is footer email link
  • tagline has no next step
  • fold spent on decorative art

Value props

28Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

TamLabs’s headline vagueTamLabsAgent teams for complex work.

Working

  • Concise, no buzzword stack
  • Category is at least legible (AI agents)
  • Confident, restrained tone

Could improve

  • No outcome or user named
  • Painting shows nothing about product
  • Zero proof points or specifics

Trust

28Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Cognition (Devin)
Lindy
CrewAI
Trust read
TamLabsNo visible trust signal identified.
Cognition (Devin)Customer logo wall featuring Citi, Goldman Sachs, Mercedes Benz, U.S. Army, Cisco, and Wayfair
LindyG2 badge with 4.9 star rating below the "Try for free" CTA
CrewAIEmbedded product screenshot of the CrewAI workspace showing an agent-building canvas with a live prompt and "Access 100s
Relevance AINo visible trust signal identified.
Sema4.aiNo visible trust signal identified.

Mobile web

42Poor

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Hero painting — Fills the entire fold with decorative art and pushes the tagline and any action out of the first viewport.
  2. Tagline below image — "Agent teams for complex work." is the only value statement and it renders below the fold with no CTA attached.
  3. Footer contact email — hello@tamlabs.ai is the page's only conversion path — plain text at the very bottom, not a tappable button.

Information hierarchy

52Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture12
  1. Tagline below hero — "Agent teams for complex work." is set in small, low-contrast grey type beneath the painting, so the only message on the page reads as a caption.
  2. Footer links in fold — Privacy, Terms and Trust are the only interactive elements visible, making legal exits the page's de facto navigation.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Lindylindy.ai79 #2Relevance AIrelevanceai.com70 #3CrewAIcrewai.com67 #4Sema4.aisema4.ai63 #5Cognition (Devin)cognition.ai62
#6TamLabs35