Waddle LabsYC S26 landing page report.
← Back to YC S26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Waddle Labs ranks

  1. 1.Sereact69
  2. 2.Waddle Labs59
  3. 3.Physical Intelligence56
  4. 4.Skild AI50
Fix Trust

Score over time

8070605040Physical Intelligence 56 on Jul 24 (Live)Skild AI 50 on Jul 24 (Live)Sereact 59 on Feb 2 (Wayback)Sereact 49 on Feb 16 (Wayback)Sereact 58 on Feb 25 (Wayback)Sereact 58 on Mar 15 (Wayback)Sereact 57 on Apr 9 (Wayback)Sereact 59 on Apr 17 (Wayback)Sereact 69 on Jul 31 (Live)Waddle Labs 61 on Sep 14 (Wayback)Waddle Labs 59 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 14Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202659LiveOverall −2 · Value props −20 · Trust −10Viewing
  2. Sep 14, 202661First tracked report — strongest Value props 78, weakest Trust 48View →

Trust

38Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Sereact
Physical Intelligence
Trust read
Waddle LabsNo visible trust signal identified.
Physical IntelligenceDated research timeline, e.g. "π0.7: a Steerable Model with Emergent Capabilities — April 16, 2026"
Skild AINo visible trust signal identified.
Sereact"$110M Series B - led by Headline" news badge

CTA

58Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Waddle Labs
Sereact

Problems

  • styled as tiny text link, not button
  • footprint dwarfed by headline
  • "our" is company-voice, not visitor
  • no payoff implied by the copy

Value props

58Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Waddle Labs’s headline vagueLLM agents for robotics controlThe last frontier in machine intelligence may fall to the bitter lesson.

Working

  • Names domain and audience instantly
  • Confident, research-lab tone
  • No buzzword abstraction stack

Could improve

  • Subhead is insider jargon, zero specifics
  • No outcome, proof, or numbers in fold
  • No hero visual showing robots in action

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Read our research link — The only CTA is a small text link, not a thumb-friendly full-width button.
  2. Desktop nav link row — Full 'Developers / Research' link row is uncollapsed instead of a hamburger menu.

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Read our research link — The only conversion action is a small underlined text link, easily missed against the giant headline.
  2. Developers Research nav — Nav links carry the same visual weight as the CTA, giving exits equal claim on the click.
  3. Headline lacks visual anchor — No imagery or motif communicates robotics or agents; the fold could belong to any AI lab.