NexYC S26 landing page report.
← Back to YC S26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

80757065605550Momentum 62 on Apr 13 (Wayback)Momentum 62 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Momentum 67 on May 11 (Wayback)Momentum 66 on May 18 (Wayback)Momentum 67 on Jun 7 (Wayback)Momentum 68 on Aug 10 (Wayback)Momentum 59 on Sep 20 (Live)Rox 71 on Apr 4 (Wayback)Rox 70 on Apr 15 (Wayback)Rox 75 on May 10 (Wayback)Rox 63 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Rox 57 on Aug 5 (Wayback)Rox 71 on Sep 20 (Live)Relevance AI 64 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Relevance AI 66 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Relevance AI 69 on May 7 (Wayback)Relevance AI 72 on May 19 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Relevance AI 71 on Jun 18 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jul 28 (Live)Day.ai 73 on May 4 (Wayback)Day.ai 73 on May 15 (Wayback)Day.ai 72 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Day.ai 65 on Sep 20 (Live)Nex 65 on Apr 25 (Wayback)Nex 57 on May 10 (Wayback)Nex 65 on May 21 (Wayback)Nex 70 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Nex 71 on Aug 3 (Wayback)Nex 74 on Sep 2 (Wayback)Nex 76 on Sep 20 (Live)Apr 25May 10May 21Jun 17Aug 3Sep 2Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202676LiveOverall +2 · Value props +8 · Information hierarchy +4Viewing
  2. Sep 2, 202674Overall +3 · CTA +8 · Information hierarchy +6View →
  3. Aug 3, 202671Overall +1 · CTA +10 · Information hierarchy −6View →
  4. Jun 17, 202670Overall +5 · Information hierarchy +12 · Value props +10View →
  5. May 21, 202665Overall +8 · CTA +26 · Value props −10View →
  6. May 10, 202657Overall −8 · Trust −24 · CTA −18View →
  7. Apr 25, 202665First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 72, weakest CTA 56View →

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Nex
Rox
Trust read
Nex"Backed by Y Combinator" badge in the hero
MomentumProduct UI mockup showing "Conversation Data Sources" with Gmail, Slack, and Teams integrations and an opportunity panel
RoxCustomer logo strip featuring MongoDB, WSP, Ramp, together.ai, Cloud Software Group, and XBOW
Relevance AINo visible trust signal identified.
Day.aiIntegration diagram naming Slack, Gong, Gmail, API, and Snowflake feeding the Day AI /company-brain

CTA

72Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Nex
Rox

Problems

  • 'Trial' implies unclear cost
  • no reassurance microcopy
  • no free offer evidence on page

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Nex’s headline sellsLET AI AGENTS RUN REVOPSAutomate complex RevOps work like CRM hygiene, churn prevention, revenue recovery, prospecting and qualification, and save thousands of $$$ in agency spend.

Working

  • Names exact jobs: CRM hygiene, churn prevention
  • Clear buyer: RevOps teams paying agencies
  • Cost-saving outcome stated in subhead

Could improve

  • "thousands of $$$" is vague — use a number
  • No product visual demonstrating the agents
  • No customer proof beyond YC/PH badges

Mobile web

86Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Start Trial button — Stops well short of the screen edges; a near-full-bleed width would make the thumb target bigger.
  2. Dot-grid menu icon — Ambiguous four-dot glyph does not read as a menu, hiding Pricing and Login behind an unrecognizable control.
  3. Subhead paragraph — Five lines listing four use cases plus savings crowds the fold with competing messages before the CTA.

Information hierarchy

88Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture12
  1. Start Trial button — Small footprint under a massive headline and no risk-reducer copy, so the action reads quieter than the promise.
  2. Subheadline paragraph — Four lines of same-weight text list five jobs at once; no emphasis guides the eye to the core benefit.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop