MagnitudeYC S25 landing page report.
← Back to YC S25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

858075706560Ollama 66 on Jun 29 (Wayback)Ollama 70 on Jul 14 (Wayback)Ollama 70 on Jul 28 (Wayback)Ollama 70 on Aug 12 (Wayback)Ollama 69 on Aug 25 (Wayback)Ollama 80 on Sep 8 (Wayback)Ollama 79 on Sep 22 (Live)LM Studio 74 on May 19 (Wayback)LM Studio 77 on Jun 2 (Wayback)LM Studio 75 on Jun 16 (Wayback)LM Studio 77 on Jun 30 (Wayback)LM Studio 75 on Jul 14 (Wayback)LM Studio 73 on Sep 8 (Wayback)LM Studio 72 on Sep 22 (Live)Jan 74 on Jun 13 (Wayback)Jan 75 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Jan 75 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Jan 75 on Aug 6 (Wayback)Jan 75 on Aug 24 (Wayback)Jan 73 on Sep 6 (Wayback)Jan 74 on Sep 20 (Live)GPT4All 66 on Sep 22 (Live)llama.cpp 69 on Jul 26 (Live)Magnitude 69 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Magnitude 81 on Sep 22 (Live)Sep 4Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202681LiveOverall +12 · Trust +21 · Mobile web +16Viewing
  2. Sep 4, 202669First tracked report — strongest Value props 82, weakest Trust 47View →

Trust

68Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Magnitude
Ollama
Trust read
MagnitudeGitHub ★ 4.8K badge in the navigation
Ollama"Trusted by more than 9M developers" above a logo wall (Microsoft, NASA, NVIDIA, IBM, Intel)
LM StudioProduct screenshot showing an agent run: "Office Plant Selection" task, "Worked for 12m 4s", and a generated plants-cand
Jan"+6.6M downloads" beneath the download CTA
GPT4AllReal GPT4All app screenshot showing chat UI with "DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B" model selector and LocalDocs panel
llama.cppCode editor screenshot with tabs "game.ts", "characters.module.css", "bonus-level.ts"

Value props

80Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Magnitude’s headline sellsRun the best local models for your machineMagnitude is an open source inference engine optimized for consumer hardware. Runs on Apple Silicon, NVIDIA, AMD, or nothing but a CPU.

Working

  • "for Magnitude's machine" nails the differentiator
  • Subhead names concrete hardware targets
  • Hero screenshot shows real hardware detection

Could improve

  • No numbers or performance proof in copy
  • Outcome of hardware matching left implicit
  • "best" claim unbacked above the fold

CTA

82Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Magnitude

Problems

  • no 'free' despite open source
  • desktop/mobile labels differ
  • button modest vs huge headline

Information hierarchy

86Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Discord and GitHub buttons — Two boxed nav buttons match the primary CTA's visual weight and pull developers off-page before they download.
  2. Download for Linux CTA — Muted gray fill barely separates from the dark background, weaker contrast than the white GitHub button beside it.
  3. Other platforms link — Low-contrast text link directly under the CTA splits the download decision at the moment of action.

Mobile web

88Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. App screenshot — Shrunken desktop UI with unreadable labels adds no information at phone size.
  2. Four-line subhead — Long paragraph pushes the primary CTA lower in the fold than it needs to be.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop