CharYC S25 landing page report.
← Back to YC S25

Score over time

9080706050Mem 56 on May 6 (Wayback)Mem 56 on May 23 (Wayback)Mem 56 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Mem 64 on Sep 22 (Live)Reflect 64 on Sep 10 (Live)Notion 84 on May 3 (Wayback)Notion 84 on May 17 (Wayback)Notion 83 on May 31 (Wayback)Notion 83 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Notion 83 on Jun 28 (Wayback)Notion 82 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Notion 83 on Sep 20 (Live)Capacities 74 on Jun 16 (Wayback)Capacities 72 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Capacities 78 on Jul 9 (Wayback)Capacities 77 on Aug 13 (Wayback)Capacities 79 on Aug 24 (Wayback)Capacities 77 on Sep 13 (Wayback)Capacities 76 on Sep 22 (Live)Napkin (Voicenotes/AI notes alternative) — Tana 68 on May 10 (Wayback)Napkin (Voicenotes/AI notes alternative) — Tana 76 on May 21 (Wayback)Napkin (Voicenotes/AI notes alternative) — Tana 74 on Jun 24 (Wayback)Napkin (Voicenotes/AI notes alternative) — Tana 70 on Jul 9 (Wayback)Napkin (Voicenotes/AI notes alternative) — Tana 71 on Aug 11 (Wayback)Napkin (Voicenotes/AI notes alternative) — Tana 75 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Napkin (Voicenotes/AI notes alternative) — Tana 75 on Sep 22 (Live)Char 73 on Apr 10 (Wayback)Char 68 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Char 71 on May 6 (Wayback)Char 72 on May 19 (Wayback)Char 75 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Char 74 on Aug 7 (Wayback)Char 74 on Sep 22 (Live)Apr 10Apr 21May 6May 19Jul 26Aug 7Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202674LiveNo score movementViewing
  2. Aug 7, 202674Overall −1 · Information hierarchy −4 · CTA −4View →
  3. Jul 26, 202675Overall +3 · Information hierarchy +14 · Mobile web +10View →
  4. May 19, 202672Overall +1 · Information hierarchy +6 · Trust +4View →
  5. May 6, 202671Overall +3 · Trust +6 · CTA +4View →
  6. Apr 21, 202668Overall −5 · Information hierarchy −8 · Mobile web −6View →
  7. Apr 10, 202673First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 82, weakest Trust 56View →

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Char
Notion
Capacities
Trust read
Char"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline
MemMobile product screenshot showing "Sep 28 JFK-SFO Roundtrip Fli…" flight details in the Mem app UI
ReflectReal product UI showing daily notes editor ("Sun, April 2nd, 2023") with backlinking, search, and calendar
Notion"Trusted by 98% of the Forbes Cloud 100" with Riot Games, affirm, and 1Password logos (mobile)
CapacitiesTrusted by 50,000+ knowledge workers · Featured in Fast Company
Napkin (Voicenotes/AI notes alternative) — TanaProduct demo panel showing a Linear issue marked Sent ("Capture drops on calls longer than an hour") and a Gmail draft d

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Char
Notion
Capacities
Napkin (Voicenotes/AI notes alternative) — Tana

Problems

  • 'private beta' feels gated, costly
  • no payoff or product value in copy
  • no header echo of 'gets things done'

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Char’s headline sellsAI notepad that gets things done.

Working

  • Outcome-led headline in seven words
  • Hero demo shows tasks being executed
  • "apple notes on steroids!" anchors familiar mental model

Could improve

  • No subhead explaining how it gets things done
  • Zero numbers or proof points beyond YC badge
  • Agent action ("researching…") half-hidden below fold on desktop

Mobile web

82Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Researching tooltip overlap — The 'researching...' bubble clips the 'Ask Elena' task text mid-word, making the demo look broken.
  2. Join private beta button — Desktop-proportioned pill at roughly half the column width instead of a full-bleed, thumb-friendly bar.
  3. Faded intro note — The 'Candidate packet is ready' line renders at near-invisible contrast and reads as a rendering glitch.

Information hierarchy

84Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture12
  1. Product screenshot cut off — The notepad demo enters the fold mid-crop with its top line faded to near-invisible, so the product proof reads as fragments instead of a legible scene.
  2. Faded note text — The opening line 'Candidate packet is ready…' is rendered so light it is illegible, wasting the first thing the eye hits inside the product window.