SavantYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Savant ranks

  1. 1.Qatalog76
  2. 2.GoSearch67
  3. 3.Savant65
  4. 4.Dashworks61
Fix Trust

Score over time

807570656055Dashworks 59 on Feb 23 (Wayback)Dashworks 60 on Mar 15 (Wayback)Dashworks 61 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Dashworks 60 on May 10 (Wayback)Dashworks 61 on Jul 28 (Live)Qatalog 76 on Jul 28 (Live)GoSearch 68 on Jun 2 (Wayback)GoSearch 66 on Jun 16 (Wayback)GoSearch 66 on Jun 25 (Wayback)GoSearch 67 on Jul 12 (Wayback)GoSearch 68 on Jul 20 (Wayback)GoSearch 63 on Aug 26 (Wayback)GoSearch 67 on Sep 20 (Live)Savant 65 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 20

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Savant
Qatalog
Dashworks
GoSearch
Trust read
Savant"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline
DashworksAnnouncement bar: "Dashworks Is Joining Forces With HubSpot"
Qatalog"25,000+ reviews from" with 4.5-star rating and G2/review-site badges under the Get started CTA
GoSearchReview rating badges "4.7 ★" and "5.0 ★" directly beneath the hero CTAs

Value props

58Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Savant’s headline vagueThe Operational Memory LayerSavant connects to the tools your team already uses and turns scattered company knowledge into structured, searchable operating context for people and AI.

Working

  • Subhead names the scattered-knowledge pain
  • Mentions both people and AI as beneficiaries
  • YC badge adds credibility

Could improve

  • H1 is insider jargon, not a value claim
  • No named tools, numbers, or outcomes
  • Hero graphic decorates, demonstrates nothing

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Savant
Qatalog
GoSearch

Problems

  • demo click feels costly/committal
  • no self-serve or low-friction path
  • no payoff framing around the demo

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Uncollapsed nav links — "Teams" and "AI agents" remain as a desktop link row instead of a hamburger, and the header loses its "Book Demo" CTA on mobile.
  2. Book Demo button — Primary CTA sits at desktop proportions, roughly 40% width, sharing its row with "Learn how it works" instead of going full-bleed.
  3. Oversized hero headline — "The Operational Memory Layer" wraps into three very large lines, pushing the subhead and CTA deep into the fold.

Information hierarchy

83Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Icosahedron hero graphic — Faint, small, and cropped at the fold — the only brand visual carries no emotional or product meaning at this size.
  2. Duplicate Book Demo buttons — Nav and hero CTAs share identical black-pill styling and label, splitting attention between two equal-weight targets.
  3. Learn how it works — Text link sits at the same baseline as the primary CTA and offers an exit before the demo action.