ReasonBlocksYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How ReasonBlocks ranks

  1. 1.Fireworks AI78
  2. 2.OpenPipe76
  3. 3.Together AI73
  4. 4.ReasonBlocks66
Fix Trust

Score over time

858075706560OpenPipe 75 on Apr 12 (Wayback)OpenPipe 76 on Apr 20 (Wayback)OpenPipe 75 on May 24 (Wayback)OpenPipe 75 on Jun 16 (Wayback)OpenPipe 76 on Jun 28 (Wayback)OpenPipe 75 on Jul 28 (Wayback)OpenPipe 76 on Jul 31 (Live)Together AI 73 on May 4 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on May 19 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on May 30 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Together AI 74 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Together AI 70 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on Jul 28 (Live)Fireworks AI 70 on Mar 24 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 73 on Apr 7 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 75 on Apr 20 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 71 on May 19 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 73 on Jun 10 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 79 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 78 on Jul 28 (Live)ReasonBlocks 70 on Apr 27 (Wayback)ReasonBlocks 66 on Sep 20 (Live)Apr 27Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202666LiveOverall −4 · Mobile web −10 · CTA −4Viewing
  2. Apr 27, 202670First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 82, weakest Trust 56View →

Trust

52Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

ReasonBlocks
OpenPipe
Together AI
Trust read
ReasonBlocks"Backed by Y Combinator" badge
OpenPipe"Trusted by top companies" logo row featuring Zapier, Y Combinator, Flow, and Method
Together AI"TRUSTED BY" logo strip with Cohere, DeepMind, LG AI Research, VFS.Global, ElevenLabs
Fireworks AIimplicit context Fireworks AI may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.

CTA

62Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

ReasonBlocks
Together AI
OpenPipe
Fireworks AI

Problems

  • high-cost click: schedules a call
  • self-serve path demoted to ghost
  • no payoff named in label

Value props

68Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

ReasonBlocks’s headline sellsThe work is yours. The model should be, too.Turn your AI workflow into a specialized model that performs cheaper, faster, and better.

Working

  • Ownership hook taps real pain of renting models
  • Eyebrow names the audience: AI teams
  • Subhead states the actual mechanism

Could improve

  • No numbers behind cheaper/faster/better
  • Hero art decorates, never shows product
  • Headline needs subhead to be parsed

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Headline and CTAs — The primary "Book a conversation" CTA and headline sit far down the scroll — the first viewport shows only the header and decorative particle art.
  2. Duplicate header CTA — A second "Book a conversation" button crowds the header and competes with the identical hero CTA further down.
  3. Open platform button — Low-contrast outlined secondary button sits beside the primary CTA at near-equal weight, splitting the tap decision.

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Open platform button — Boxed at near-equal weight beside the primary CTA, splitting the visitor's one action into two.
  2. Duplicate nav CTA — Repeats the hero's "Book a conversation" at identical black weight, creating two same-rank primary buttons in one fold.
  3. Docs and Sign in — Two exit links sit directly beside the nav CTA at the top of the scan path, leaking attention before the pitch lands.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop