InthYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26
Inthhttps://inth.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Inth ranks

  1. 1.Inth77
  2. 2.Privado66
  3. 3.Bearer65
  4. 4.HoundDog.ai64
Fix Trust
77Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust68Information hierarchy78Value props78Mobile web78CTA84
category scoresShowHide
Trust68Information hierarchy78Value props78Mobile web78CTA84

Score over time

8075706560Privado 68 on Apr 16 (Wayback)Privado 66 on May 14 (Wayback)Privado 66 on Jun 28 (Wayback)Privado 66 on Sep 20 (Live)Bearer 66 on Apr 16 (Wayback)Bearer 67 on Jun 16 (Wayback)Bearer 66 on Jul 5 (Wayback)Bearer 66 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Bearer 65 on Sep 20 (Live)HoundDog.ai 67 on May 18 (Wayback)HoundDog.ai 66 on Jun 11 (Wayback)HoundDog.ai 66 on Jun 30 (Wayback)HoundDog.ai 64 on Sep 20 (Live)Inth 64 on Apr 17 (Wayback)Inth 68 on May 4 (Wayback)Inth 68 on Jun 8 (Wayback)Inth 69 on Jul 20 (Wayback)Inth 70 on Aug 30 (Wayback)Inth 77 on Sep 20 (Live)Apr 17May 4Jun 8Jul 20Aug 30Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202677LiveOverall +7 · Trust +16 · Mobile web +16Viewing
  2. Aug 30, 202670Overall +1 · Information hierarchy −4 · Value props +4View →
  3. Jul 20, 202669Overall +1 · CTA +16 · Trust −6View →
  4. Jun 8, 202668Information hierarchy +4 · Value props −2View →
  5. May 4, 202668Overall +4 · Trust +8 · Mobile web +6View →
  6. Apr 17, 202664First tracked report — strongest Value props 76, weakest Trust 44View →

Trust

68Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
Inth"Trusted by" logo strip featuring Mastra, Mintlify, and Cal.com
PrivadoDetailed "Privacy Impact Assessment - Project X" product UI showing uploaded docs and a data-element sensitivity table w
BearerGitHub "Star 2,746" badge in the navigation
HoundDog.aiNo visible trust signal identified.

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Nav dropdown cluster — Three dropdowns plus Pricing and Sign in create six exits competing with the scan CTA.
  2. Talk to us button — Styled at near-equal weight beside Run a free scan, splitting the hero's single action.
  3. Trusted by logos — Roboto and Cal.com marks are faded near-invisible, weakening the proof band's credibility.

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Inth’s headline sellsMonitor and fix product privacy issues before they block growthInth monitors your pull requests, codebase and website to catch privacy issues and turns them into fixes and evidence.

Working

  • Names outcome: fixes and evidence, not scans
  • Concrete surfaces: PRs, codebase, website
  • Hero image shows product finding real PII issue

Could improve

  • Zero numbers anywhere in the fold
  • 'Block growth' is vague vs rest of copy
  • No proof point on speed or coverage

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Hero CTA pair — Side-by-side desktop-width buttons leave the primary 'Run a free scan' at half-column size instead of full-bleed.
  2. Floating utility widget — The theme/fingerprint pill overlaps and hides the 'Privacy agent' description text mid-sentence.
  3. Header scan button — Duplicates the hero 'Run a free scan' CTA, crowding the collapsed header with a competing tap target.

CTA

84Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Inth

Problems

  • four words, past 3-word ideal
  • hero button small vs huge headline

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Inth77
#2Privadoprivado.ai66 #3Bearerbearer.com65 #4HoundDog.aihounddog.ai64