Gojiberry AIYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Gojiberry AI ranks

  1. 1.Gojiberry AI80
  2. 2.Dreach74
  3. 3.Crelate70
  4. 4.SourceWhale69
  5. 5.Loxo62
Fix Trust

Score over time

908070605040Dreach 63 on Sep 3 (Wayback)Dreach 74 on Sep 20 (Live)SourceWhale 64 on Apr 12 (Wayback)SourceWhale 52 on May 10 (Wayback)SourceWhale 54 on May 19 (Wayback)SourceWhale 66 on Jun 25 (Wayback)SourceWhale 69 on Sep 20 (Live)Crelate 58 on Apr 2 (Wayback)Crelate 58 on May 14 (Wayback)Crelate 70 on Sep 20 (Live)Loxo 56 on Apr 17 (Wayback)Loxo 57 on May 19 (Wayback)Loxo 61 on Aug 22 (Wayback)Loxo 61 on Sep 2 (Wayback)Loxo 62 on Sep 20 (Live)Gojiberry AI 67 on Apr 7 (Wayback)Gojiberry AI 80 on Jun 1 (Wayback)Gojiberry AI 80 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Gojiberry AI 80 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Gojiberry AI 80 on Aug 6 (Wayback)Gojiberry AI 78 on Sep 9 (Wayback)Gojiberry AI 80 on Sep 20 (Live)Apr 7Jun 1Jun 15Jul 2Aug 6Sep 9Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202680LiveOverall +2 · Mobile web +6 · Trust +4Viewing
  2. Sep 9, 202678Overall −2 · Trust −4 · Information hierarchy −2View →
  3. Aug 6, 202680Mobile web −11 · Value props +4View →
  4. Jul 2, 202680Value props −4 · Trust +4View →
  5. Jun 15, 202680Trust +6 · Mobile web −6View →
  6. Jun 1, 202680Overall +13 · Information hierarchy +22 · Trust +18View →
  7. Apr 7, 202667First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 90, weakest Trust 44View →

Trust

72Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
Gojiberry AIG2 4.8/5 star rating beside the testimonial "We made our money back 6x already, and our week is now fully booked with me
Dreach"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline
SourceWhaleProduct UI preview with feature tabs "Find Talent / AI Assistant / Run Outreach / Close & Place"
Crelate4.6 average across G2 · Capterra · GetApp · TrustPilot
Loxo"850-million-person talent graph we built ourselves. Not a GPT wrapper on rented data."

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Oversized hero headline — Wraps into four tall lines, pushing the input and CTA toward the bottom of the fold.
  2. Launch CTA button — Floats at two-thirds width instead of the full-bleed tap target mobile allows.
  3. Plus menu icon — A '+' glyph is ambiguous as a menu trigger versus a standard hamburger.

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Start for free button — Second CTA at header weight competes with the primary 'Launch my agent for free' action below.
  2. Five-item nav row — Features, Playbooks, Case Studies, Pricing, and Demo are five equal-weight exits before the visitor reaches the input.
  3. Testimonial proof line — The quote 'It's like having a radar…' is set in tiny grey type, too faint to register as social proof.

Value props

82Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Gojiberry AI’s headline sellsYour AI agent finds high intent leads and contacts them for you.Enter your website. Gojiberry learns your business, identifies your best prospects, and runs multichannel outreach automatically.

Working

  • Outcome-first: finds leads AND contacts them
  • Subhead explains the how in 3 concrete steps
  • "for Gojiberry AI" signals effort removed

Could improve

  • No hard numbers on leads or meetings
  • Desktop quote is metaphor, not results
  • Product demo cut off below the fold

CTA

88Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Gojiberry AIin-product action

Problems

  • placeholder is a bare URL, no verb
  • submit label runs 5 words
  • nav says 'Start', hero says 'Launch'

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop